Yeah, depends on the scale I guess...

I got 170-ish a few years ago, dunno now, haven't taken a test in ages.

@tojam: please use code tags

Python has significant whitespace and it's hard for me to correct all those indentation errors without looking at the code.

Also that's the least Pythonic Python I've seen today... functions and for loops do exist in Python- it's actually Turing complete (shocker, I know). :)

Edited 12/9/2015 21:56:35

Do psychologist get paid to give high numbers? Or do they just make them up for fun?

^^^^

It shows something more strategic mindset I remember a thread I made a few weeks back about personality types and there was a lot of INTP's and other analytical types

Edited 12/9/2015 21:52:45

the average IQ of Polish peoples is 70, this was demonstrated by Russian scientists

Edited 12/9/2015 21:55:28

^
Has Karl or Ion returned?

Yes he has sadly Luna...

Knyte and tbest mysteriously have similar profile pictures.

It reminds me of Benjamin and fleece master

Genghis your IQ..

It's low.

I've never had an iq test and I'd imagine it's bollocks.

I'd put myself at 100-115. But since everyone has a different scale it's all very irrelevant

That said, the only true iq test would have a series of difficult puzzles.

That picture.. context needed please.

This is me

I don't think context is needed.

I would say my IQ but most likely it would become a barrage of "I didn't know you could get negative IQ"

I got 375.5894 but I can't screenshot.

so far I was the only one to be able to show his report

Problem with for loop is I'd have to do x = n then the question so it's still as long, sorry about the indentations, just do an indent after the colon, still need results though.