An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 20:53:11 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
Wrong, Ox. Dead wrong. Both Netherlands and Germany (and quite a few other Euronations) have nukes. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Nuclear_weapons_states.svg/560px-Nuclear_weapons_states.svg.pngAll colored countries have nukes (except the green nations, which are nationa that have had nukes).
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 20:55:09 |
Ox
Level 58
Report
|
That was a side-side-side point of my main case. I'm not "dead-wrong". My point still stands. Nukes are incredibly wasteful, and immoral to the UK as a whole.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 20:56:28 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
I was taking about *just* the thing regarding Germany and the Netherlands not having Nukes.
And actually, Conservative is kinda right... nukes are the only real reason why UK is a military power.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 20:56:28 |
Ox
Level 58
Report
|
@Ben And how does this have anything to do with the UK?
EDIT: @Tyrion, Yeah. That was something I conceded, yet said something else about. Why does UK want to be a military power? It is a desperate shadow of its former self that is doing anything to cling onto a fragment of their glory days. They should give it up.
Edited 12/28/2015 20:57:24
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 20:59:47 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
Because, Ox, if the UK isn't an economic power, nor military, nor cultural...
You get what I'm saying.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:02:45 |
SirSalty
Level 49
Report
|
Lies as of yet only 8 countries have nukes, they are split into two categories. Those who have signed the agreement and those who haven't. France,Britain,China,Russia,USA who are permitted to have nukes. And India,Israel. ,Pakistan who are not allowed but have them any way
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:03:09 |
Ox
Level 58
Report
|
And? Why is it important to be an economic/military/cultural/political power? Why can't UK just accept that she's no good anymore?
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:04:05 |
SirSalty
Level 49
Report
|
Do I have to get the video out Ox. Proving you wrong?
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:05:23 |
Luna {TJC}
Level 57
Report
|
@Tyrion
We're not that bad you know. London one of the three financial cities of the world. We have the best (or top 3rd to 4th) special forces and secret agents, Large amounts of influence in some former colonies ect. All this means the UK has a very large amount of soft power.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:05:33 |
Ox
Level 58
Report
|
I don't want to see your home videos again, no.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:09:19 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
I know, New Luna.
But the point is, London isn't becoming any more major of a city. Singapore/Hong Kong/ Seoul/Tokyo are.
And secret agents are good... but nukes and manpower win wars.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:10:08 |
SirSalty
Level 49
Report
|
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:14:04 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
really, Salty?
I don't have time to bother with ridiculous conspiracy theories. Especially **** like that...
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:15:24 |
SirSalty
Level 49
Report
|
It isn't a conspiracy theory it just wasn't related to Alltime 10s.....as it wasn't 10 facts.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:15:48 |
Luna {TJC}
Level 57
Report
|
@The Conservative The roads thing was a joke btw
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 21:16:32 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
Sorry. I didn't bother to watch the video before- just read the description about the UK controlling the US.
And after watching the video, it seems like they are exaggerating.
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 22:01:14 |
(deleted)
Level 56
Report
|
Well Ox the world of course would be better without nukes but the second one country disarms it immediately puts it In danger. In fact, that's how I think the U.S. will eventually fall. The Hippie California bastards will eventually convince the people to disarm our nuclear weapons without getting the same courtesy from the other nuclear powers. Then, with no war nuclear deterrent, U.S. will suffer from a Major loss of power, her foreign policy will be forced to become less defense, and in the end we will be nuked
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 22:06:40 |
(deleted)
Level 56
Report
|
And gentleman let me remind you, there is a massive difference between being able to make a bomb and actually having a bomb. Germany, Netherlands, Turkey, and Poland are all nations who have bombs ( usually because the U.S. gave them ) however none of them can make them. America, Britain, Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea, France, are all nations who have created their own nuclear weapons
|
An Argument in Favor Of Libertarianism: 12/28/2015 22:09:19 |
Lord Varys
Level 47
Report
|
^ Israel.
Japan has the capability.
South Africa has made nukes.
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|