Pulsey if you just stopped truncating my comments, this is not the proper way to debate about topics, because you are just failing answering my own comments, since you do not take the effort to answer globally what I posted.
You are here again inventing words I never stated, I never defended the persons committing terrorist attacks in Paris and elsewhere, my point was to show you that Kouachi brothers, Mohamed Merah, or Abdelhamid Abaaoud weren't political terrorists in my opinion (as the currrent definition of terrorism is mostly outdated and based upon 80s political terrorism such as far-left, far-right, or nationalist such as IRA or ETA, see links I posted), but way worse than this, these people are insane people much more similar as mental patients, it has already been proved that these people's first motivation was to satisfy their urges of destruction, or recognition (being a Martyr and a narcissistic posture to have a famous name that people should remember), experienced huge traumas in their life, etc.

Major, what the hell are you talking about? Banning Charlie Hebdo caricaturists and journalists? Did you forget that most of them (excepted one woman, that was spared just because she was a woman and of North African origin, and a Doctor editorialist that wasn't there during the attacks), already paid a heavy tribute: THEY DIED. THey were atrociously murdered, and suffered a terrible death. How can you post such insanities Major, banning dead people? Do you think this is relevant at all?

What you said was...

I see no difference between mass shooters and these so called terrorists committing atrocities for ISIS, all of them are insane people having most of the time psychological traumas

and now...

these people are insane people much more similar as mental patients, it has already been proved that these people's first motivation was to satisfy their urges of destruction, or recognition...

Please tell me how the Paris attacks were carried out by 'so called terrorists'?

Many of these attackers have links to Islamic terrorist groups such as Boko Haram, ISIS or Al - Qaeda, some were already known to intelligence services, and you tell me that the reason they kill is because they are 'insane' and have 'psychological traumas?'

And really? How do you justify their motivations have 'already been proved?' The terrorists in Paris are already all dead. Assuming you really are right in your deluded mind, where is your evidence? Meanwhile ISIS declares that the Paris attacks were conducted in retaliation for French bombings and it is reported that the Toulouse shootings were a result of French participation in Afghan war. And you tell me these attacks aren't political but just to 'satisfy their urges of destruction or recognition?

My point stands. You seem to think that you live in a bubble, that Islamic Terrorism is a myth and these atrocities only happened because the attackers want to 'satisfy their urges of destruction'. Your apologetic attitude to these killers is very insulting to the people who've died.

You are here again inventing words I never stated,

There is a pattern arguing with you. You make an observation, I attack that observation, then you tell me that I am inventing words from you and attacking a strawman, and then you reiterate the same thing again, without any response to any of my points.

Edited 1/17/2016 13:23:35

Who cares? They're pretty much just a bunch of Trumps who get to draw comics. And the entire staff is not dead, they still exist.

And yes it is relevant to the main topic, unlike your and Pulseys conversation.

Edited 1/17/2016 15:33:40

http://www.c-span.org/video/?403099-1/british-house-commons-debate-barring-donald-trump-uk

What a waste of the Parliament's time. 2 hours and 58 minutes for a bill we all know won't pass.

Just skip to minute 45 so you can here Gavin Robinson of the Democratic Unionist Party give a commonsense, rational, and entirely coherent explanation for why Trump should not be banned.

the Democratic Unionist Party give a commonsense, rational, and entirely coherent explanation

That phrase has never been said before in history.

Did you listen to his speech?