Welcome to the thread! If you came here to browse, good day. If you came here to share an idea, post. If you came to hate, go right ahead.

*hate*

Ahh, welcome!

Edited 1/26/2016 04:11:28

*hate*

Corporate Diplomacy: The primary purpose of this style of play is not to defeat your enemy or form alliances but rather to maximize profits for your shareholders in the form of army income.

Required features:
•Heavily naturally protected original source of income, even to the point of making conventional play impossible.
•Plenty of neutral land and hard to get bonuses where instead of 'expanding' you're 'investing' armies, and perhaps a 'stock market' area to allow traditional competition.
•Redesign the traditional alliance system to fit the new corporate partnership system.
•Make use of cards for corporate sabotage and even possibly include a host with the power to enforce things like anti-trust (monopoly) laws.

This style of play could potentially be introduced into pre-existing maps, and could even be tied into traditional diplomacy play.

.

Edited 1/26/2016 15:43:13

no Juji, no.

It's a very good idea. I like it.

normies get out REEEEEEEEE. This is risk not some normie stock market simulator.

I don't respect you coming into here. I asked for an idea, and they gave one. If you dislike it, send him a PM. Don't post on this forum if you don't have an idea. I accept the two before you, but not you.

you seem upset. Why don't you make your own game instead of trying to bastardize risk?

Juli, that kinda sounds similar to a normal type of game, what exactly would be different about it?

Why don't you get out of here? Question for a question.