well i think everybody has been in the situation

you were about to commit and got booted

you got backstabbed despite having a truce

Player will just play on to make it difficult for you to win

player will not surrender and just waste everybodys time

player will ragequit



i would really much liek the posibility to rate players and give them malus point in these and various other categories and then when u make a game u can decide how bad a player can be rated to join your game

the other way around should be possible 2 if a player is fun to talk 2 a team player and or polite in general u should be able to give him a star in each of these categories if a player collects like 100 stars in one ctegory he can trade them in for some reward (maybe an achivement)

This is what blacklists and friends lists are for...

frinedlist dont work cause u have everybody who is not on ur blacklist on your frinedslist and blacklist is just if they pissed u of enough they cant join your games anymore i know that both exsist but they dont cover what i wanna do if u blacklist a player he will most likely not chage his behavior but if u get reward s for beeing nice u will and the other way around 2 if people can see that u are not wellbehaved in games (by seeing ur negative stats of playerratings u will want to try to better them)

Well I dont know about a reward system but I can definitely see a system that ranks positive review. If I buy something on Ebay I will rate the seller on the experience and I know which sellers to buy from and which to not buy from. This being implemented into WL can be beneficial so you can create games with filters based on positive review. If you create rewards then people will be fishing for positive reviews and it will get extremely annoying. You cant change the a-holes, you can only find a better way to exclude them. Also noobs might just rate everyone poorly because they think its funny so there are a lot of factors that would go into this.

If you do that other players will be able to give you a negative rating for no reason. The same kind of player that doesn't accept defeat and waste time only to fuck you is free to fuck your rating and people won't be able to tell if you got the negative points because you did something bad or for revenge...
This is the reason Ebay decided to quit the negative vote option... I don't think it's a good idea.

I always liked the idea of a karma system, that is giving someone positive points or negative points after a game, or on the forums for a good/interesting points. It does cause some controversy, but it also gives us a way to promote good behavior on the forums and in-game. No system is perfect, however, so I would understand if Fizzer doesn't want to add something like that.

(Rating system is a little bit complicated imo. That's why I bring this up.)

but still u could add those points like if u get one click after u wasted someones time and after u have collected like 10 times the negative click u get one negative karma point (maybe even means worse luck in a game =D ) but still it would show on karmachart that u are 1 point negative karma

I'm personally against this.
With no real rule regarding multi accounts, (other than you can't use them to gain an advantage in a game) 1 person can screw up someones rating, and really mess with their gaming experience.

Say I played a game against someone, and that person gave me a good thrashing.
I could then legally create a lot of accounts and put his ratings down out of spite.

I personally think the settings covers it fairly well, with only people who have been booted less than X or won more than Y% of 1v1 games.

i think there are solutions for the problem you are adressing like u can rate a player onyl once every 5 or 10 games u play together

People don't have to surrender dumbass. You wanna downvote a person just because they wouldn't surrender? That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

if u have lost and i mean obviously lost then you should surrender especially if its an ffa the settings take care of the rest but you should not play on to waste anybodys time or to hinder any special player from winning

Depends on the situation. I have played games in the past where it would have ruined my enjoyment of the game as a whole if the losing players had surrendered early.

Everything touched upon in this thread seems to be a controversial topic. Where shall I start? xD

কিভাবে সম্পর্কে বাজে কথা নেই.