Conservative, shut up.

Your not a conservative, not a socialist, not a communist, not a democrat, not a republican.

And I wonder how much of a libertarian you are.

^ So Conservative is nothing?

I'd rather join ISIS than the democrats or republicans.

Reported you to the NSA, Homeland Security, and the mosque a town over from me. I have great news!! They'll take you :D

At one point publicly supported segregation

Did you know FDR's Supreme Court nominee Hugo Black was a former KKK member. Also Woodrow Wilson supported segregation as well. Both of the poster children and idols of the Democratic Party (even today) were racists.

Edited 2/10/2016 23:10:02

In all seriousness, at their height in the 20s, the KKK had 25 million members... and population was much lower back then.

Reported you to the NSA, Homeland Security, and the mosque a town over from me. I have great news!! They'll take you :D

Darn, and I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling Warlighters!

" Conservative, shut up.

Your not a conservative, not a socialist, not a communist, not a democrat, not a republican.

And I wonder how much of a libertarian you are " - Joffery


" ^ So Conservative is nothing? " - Koala



For some reason, Koala's responses to this troll have gotten me laughing pretty hard recently, Keep on troll slaying!

I did some research, as the American election is coming closer.

- Have not gotten the black vote in, what?, 50 years?

That's attributed to many things. The minorities in America, as I understand, are typically poorer and want more things given to them by the government, that's Democratic.

- Like to bomb....everyone EXCEPT ISRAEL! No no the jews are perfect!!

Both sides do, though; Democrats somewhat less, though.

- Started the red scare

The Russian Revolution started the Red Scare, not any Americans.

They have Sarah Palin and Donald Trump......nough said

I do not know who Sarah Palin is, but I think Donald Trump gets loads of unearned hate and many misconceptions.

- In bed with oil

Shared flaw with Democratic party.

DEMOCRATS:
- Want to give your money to lazy pricks who never worked a day in there life

+1

- Think you have no logical use for your guns, yet, they see why the secret service needs them....just not you

To be fair, even if guns were fully illegalised in America, they're still going to be gotten from a black market. I think the guns/weapons industry is one of the few things that needs to be nationalised. Also, most folk who own guns don't have a fire extinguisher - they can't really say they are carrying guns for shielding their life and family.

- They still cry about the 2000 election, Oh for fucks sake it was 16 years ago! move on already!

This is a bit hypocritic. You criticise [Republicans] at one point publicly supported segregation. I don't think they did in anytime 16 years ago.

---

Also, perhaps the most blaring thing to me: republican and democratic practically mean the same thing (and do many of the same things, but still) - why don't they call it something sensible - Republicans are Traditionalists, while Democrats are Conservatives.

Edited 2/11/2016 00:28:40

Conservations? I'm not familiar with that political term?

I think he means Conservatives.

Xpapy does not always speak perfect English, he's from Kazakhstan.

Lee me clarify, when I said started the scare I meant to say took advantage of

Oh okay I see what he means. Just wanted clarification.

Why does the flag on his account say USA? Shouldn't it show Kazakhstan's?

Edited 2/11/2016 00:49:13

He uses a proxy server.

Ahh gotcha.

At least we're not a theocracy

Want to control your right to marry who you want

This is like saying that abolitionists "wanted to control your right to hold slaves" by abolishing slavery. And yes, this was actually an argument used by democrat opponents of abolition.

US law is rife not only with examples of things you have the right to do, but also moral evils you have the right to be free from ever having to experience. Viewing "Freedom" as only applying to the former is narrow-minded, and frankly doesn't make much sense.

Edited 2/11/2016 14:00:02

This is like saying that abolitionists "wanted to control your right to hold slaves" by abolishing slavery. And yes, this was actually an argument used by democrat opponents of abolition.

US law is rife not only with examples of things you have the right to do, but also moral evils you have the right to be free from ever having to experience. Viewing "Freedom" as only applying to the former is narrow-minded, and frankly doesn't make much sense.

Personally, I think the slavery comparison works better in the case of abortion because there's actually a second party being directly hurt/killed. Those in favor of it state their "Right" to do it because their victims aren't "truly human".

Still though, very sound logic.

I agree it does apply a lot more to abortion in that sense, but the concept applies to practically any modern "Social Justice" issue. Just swap out the quote at the top of the post for any quote from some jackass(pun intended) democrat.

It doesn't matter what party you're apart of this point. It's the 1% vs the 99% quite literally.
I'm not talking about the money representation. No,I'm talking about the psychopaths who want nothing but money and don't give a shit about anyone else to get it. The ones who advocate for all these crazy bills that don't dick but make them richer.