It's a lone wolf. Islamic terrorist attacks are well-organized and have hundreds of men involved, and Muslim terrorists have a broad political goal. No one fears Christian terrorist attacks because they're jokes. This "attack" was a joke.

Furthermore, not a single person was killed in this attack. I wouldn't be surprised if we found out later that it was a set up to create a new, artificial perspective on religious terrorism. Terrorist attacks aren't supposed to kill nobody. All of the recent Islamic terrorist attacks have killed in the double digits.

give em hell

Ever heard of the Crusades GeneralPE? Is it something ignored in America? I am really starting to wonder how is your education?

Islam does not encourages terrorism, but radicalism does, same thing applies to Christianity.

Your lack of objectivity from some of you here in this very topic PE is astonishing.

Terrorism is killing in great majority Muslims not Christians. Muslims.
You should show more respect to those 1.7 billion people who are Muslims and aren't terrorist and fighting against terrorists. And you should be ashamed of your childish behavior.

Islam encourages violence. I have given quotes and Mohammed's actions. What more do you need?

Also, Crusades were not 'Christian extremism'. Read this:
http://www.amazon.com/Gods-Battalions-The-Case-Crusades/dp/0061582603
Multi-cultural, Islam-pandering historical revisionism at its best.

People will never accept that they have more in common with muslims then not. All the religions of the book preach the same message, each one of them defends peace and war, holy war and tolerance. You fail to be neutral when you start to state that Islamic terrorism kills more, or that christian terrorism isn't real.

Every religion killed A LOT, depending on the time. You could consider that the actions of america in the Middle East were justified if you're an american, or that they were just acts of imperialism and conquest if you're an Irakian. People fail to see the questions by every possible angle, and then take partial positions that have no reflection at-all behind them.

So killing people makes it okay if they are the same religion? What is you're point?
I doubt there are 1 billion Muslims in the world making a real effort to stop terrorism. Once more, I point you to http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/16/geller-do-muslims-around-the-world-really-hate-the-united-states-yes/

I am not acting childish; I am trying to show people the dangers of Islam.

You fail to be neutral when you start to state that Islamic terrorism kills more

How is stating facts not neutral? What?

Muslims and Christians have a lot in common, just like all people. But Islam and Christianity are quite different. Christians have killed, but it wasn't in Jesus's path.

Explain me if Islam is a religion of destruction, backwardness and death, why Muslims societies were more advanced during the Middle Age known as Dark Age for Europe since the backwardness of Europeans was total in every aspects?

@GeneralPE, quotes from the bible for you:


"Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the [holy man] who represents God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged."


"Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.' " … He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all his people he totally destroyed with the sword."


"Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword, their little ones shall be dashed in pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open."


Now again, how is Christianism any better then Islamism? Every religion of the book encourages violence and peace. Saying that one of them, Islam, only encourages violence, and that the other 2, Christianism and Judaism defend peace, it's to be either misinformed, or to be a hippocrite.

PE: "Christians have killed, but it wasn't in Jesus's path" : Crusades, Spanish Inquisition, the Genocide of the Cathars, the mass killing of pagan Saxons and then pagan Baltic people by Christian knights? Do you want more?

Edited 3/29/2016 23:25:40

The last two quotes are closed-ended, not open like in the Quran. And Christians believe the New Testament takes precedence over the Old

Path, not name. I understand English isn't your first language, so I will excuse it. Path means they follow in his footsteps. Jesus never harmed a man in his life. Following his path would be to do the same

Edited 3/29/2016 23:29:36

"But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me." Luke 19:17

"Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law;
And a man's enemies will be the members of his household."
Luke 12:49-53


All of these above are quotes from Jesus. Are they clear enough for you? Or will I need to keep digging quotes?

Edited 3/29/2016 23:31:56

Pls stop using that second quote. It illustrates only that devout people must buck the trend. It has not got anything to do with violence

I perfectly know what "path" means but it seems however you do not know how to use it, very worrying for an English native speaker such as you PE. In Jesus's path (when wrongly interpreted in the Bible, like some people do with the Quran and similarly in "Muhammad's path") people also killed, unless you are an ignorant you should have known this.

Let me now be clear about religion, you won't teach me anything about it, I had to attend catechism for years, and read the Bible and went to Pilgrimage in 3 sacred christian places (Lourdes, Santiago and Rome), because I was from a very religious family, I am actually quite confident that I know more about Christianity than you do (by judging your participations and comments about Christianity). And hence you would have known that Islam and Christianity, when wrongly interpreted or when people are perverted by fundamentalists of both religions, are equally dangerous and destructive.

No, Christianity when wrongly interpreted is just as dangerous as Islam in its true form

^ No, Christianity when wrongly interpreted is just as dangerous as Islam.

There's a passage about killing children in the bible, quit your yammering about how the bible is free of criticism because it had a Jewish rebel in it.

GeneralPE, tell me how do you interpret the quotes I just gave you? For me interpreting that passages on the literal way is just dangerous enough.

Stop demonizing Islam and sanctifying Christianism. Don't be a hippocrite.