Where do you stop, though?

I'd delegate as much as possible, except geopolit. Noone knows about geopolit.

No, geopolicies are interesting. I will cover geopolicy.

Edited 4/22/2016 18:42:18

Deadline for voting:
Tomorrow 11:59 PM EST.

If nobody else votes, I'll be the Green/Socialist candidate and make Xapy my vice president.

and since this is only a simulation, not a country, we won't see the results of your "experts" and character is most of the game.

This still is relevant Juq. This isn't a country, it's an election simulation. Listening to your experts might build a good country but arguing for what you believe in is the point of this, and to just say "I'm right because experts are smarter than you" really detracts from the fun.

arguing for what you believe in is the point of this

I believe that I'm not qualified nor informed enough by miles to make rash economic choices, and so I don't take any stand in economy.

If you want, I can roll the dice.

I offer myself as candidate for the Liberaldemocratic wing of the Green/Socialist Party.
I vote in favour of Xapy, tough I will not support to not support Israel.
I am fine with abandoning the CIA and the NSA, but for abandoning the FBI I have to oppose Xapy, as the FBI still is useful unlike the CIA.

The FBI are thugs and gangsters. They were engaged in huge amounts of political censorship, and are largely corrupt. Get rid of those punks.

They murdered and extorted from folk, enforced prohibition of alcohol on folk and gaoled communists for speaking their opinions.

Yeah it was CIA

So:
TheFalconGuy:2
Xapy: 2 or 1
Prussian: 1 or 0 (Is he running or not)?

we want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in my sex-life and threatening blackmail. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to peep through my bedroom window over and over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

Anti-non-mainstream-political-group program by the FBI.

Few more policies:
*Ratify Geneva Conventions and UN basic human rights convention.
*Invade ISIS-held territory if with a UN coalition and pre-ISIS governments are respected. Have a permanent garrison in Iraq after war in order to ensure stability.

I see the socialists want to continue Bush's crusade against Gog and Magog.

Folk of the world! Do not fall to the reds! They will take your money and throw you to war at a moments notice to "maintain stability". But the only thing to come to the world from this is continued war , death, and imperialism. The government sent us to Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Somalia, Grenada, Vietnam , Cuba, Korea, Haiti, Nicuragua, Honduras and the Philippines. These are only a fraction of the countries the warmongers sent folk to , to rob and pillage. Now they want to send folk to Syria. Will this be the last time like they say? No, it will just be another chain in violent attack after violent attack. Free yourselves this November, and vote libertarian!

Invade ISIS-held territory if with a UN coalition and pre-ISIS governments are respected. Have a permanent garrison in Iraq after war in order to ensure stability.

Mm, be sceptic of the UN. If China, America, Russia, Britain, and France agree on something, that doesn't mean it's an universal foe, it just means a foe that these 5 governments all hate.

Yeah I run for it, Falcon Guy. I will back you up.

Also, how is Leia doin´ and is your family all fine?

UN is too facist, to dictating. Our party should not support the UN.

I prefer to use Russia to crush ISIS/ISIL.
And then USA may step in to exterminate Assad, but right now he still is necessary.
He is a key figure. If he falls, the ISIS will be able to conquer all of Syria.
And then we´ll have fun.

I prefer to use Russia to crush ISIS/ISIL.
And then USA may step in to exterminate Assad, but right now he still is necessary.
He is a key figure. If he falls, the ISIS will be able to conquer all of Syria.
And then we´ll have fun.

With a UN coalition, a defeat of ISIS would be quicker in most cases and would improve relations with them as we would have helped fight a common enemy.
We shouldn't assasinate Assad, before or after the defeat of ISIS. Syria is still in a civil war, and removing the longstanding government wouldn't help in creating a better future for the Middle East. We need to diversify investment in the Middle East in order to bring economic stability and less reliance on oil in order to lower tensions among the region (although there would be some tensions with Israel).

Yes, as I said, totally my opinion, Assad shouldn´t get removed. We need him until all this civil war and ISIS is defeated, I know, i was just saying that the USA might interfere there.

With a UN coalition, a defeat of ISIS would be quicker in most cases and would improve relations with them as we would have helped fight a common enemy.

Yeah, do what the UN wants, but wars must be far more justified than they are today, even if the UN declared war on Mashriq, I do not think it would be justified either way.

We need to diversify investment in the Middle East in order to bring economic stability and less reliance on oil in order to lower tensions among the region (although there would be some tensions with Israel).

No, "We" need to get out of there, that's not our problem, and you're just burdening American denizens to make the setting even worse there. A government should be a stewardship, not a militarist overlord.

Japan had the same rhetor in the 1930s, in the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, to help out their "friends" in China and elsewhere.

Final Vote:
TheFalconGuy: 3
Xapy: 1

If no one else will vote, I will take the nomination as party candidate.
Xapy will be my vice.

We should talk about official party policies...