Love how you don't know any major details before complaining Billy, truly a great scholar, given the games you posted before in the forum.
Lots of players have fun games, or chat games, and the like, so it might easily not be 20 real multiday games. Even then, if even a significant portion of those are ladder games or other relatively serious material, I can see why he would reduce the number of games. Granted, you can stall a little bit at the top with just a single game, but you don't gain very much from this since you won't get more until you finish. I'm not autistic, just scatterbrained (why is that an insult?) and I have issues with consistency so I can really only play one set of games (3-5 max) at one time relatively well. The rest are clearly subpar. I don't see the issue with him reducing games to focus on them better. If Buns is going at a steady clip of 8 games/2 months, thats 1 game a week, which seems a pretty decent pace in my opinion for a ladder.
There are other people who clearly stall, Buns is fine.
Speaking of Dunning and Kruger, your highest listed rank is 15th, a tad surprising given some of the games you demonstrated before. Many people commenting here have climbed higher on ladders than you, or outright won on their posting accounts or alts. Apparently I should take all of their opinions over yours from what you imply. Thanks for reinforcing my current opinion. :D
(unless ofc you are more experienced than that, in which case you should really have known about expired games, given you seem to be taking advantage of them, and are just playing dumb.)
(here's what I am talking about -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect . Presumably Billy means the same thing, though he already missed a number of high rankers on this thread.)
Edited 4/25/2016 16:16:40
