Poor people with no skills should be payed accordingly.

Poor folk with no skills should die*. And maybe, adding to that, anyone who scores below 5ers in school should be gassed, as these are folk with no brains.

If you can't find a job, join the army.

Besides the filth of the concept of army itself, you have to be somewhat physically and mentally fit to join most armies, and they have rejection rates and quotas as to how many folk they accept, just like normal jobs. It's just like joining the watch or any other government service - you must be somewhat qualified.

This is actually an excellent idea. I approve.
Also, Karl, Shut the fuck up.

No ones going to pay you nothing

What a naive person...

Poor folk with no skills should die*. And maybe, adding to that, anyone who scores below 5ers in school should be gassed, as these are folk with no brains.

Yeah ahah Juq, you got it, Hitler in his time implemented this solution: he gassed "useless" people to the society (poorest ones, deficient ones, etc).

And indeed I agree, about the army everybody cannot join it at all, in France when military service was mandatory (20 years ago), some people with weak psychological abilities (known as P4 in France) were forbidden to join the army.

we should abolish the min wage

market dynamics decide wages perfectly

wage is determine by the employer and employee

government shouldnt interfere in it

within this case the goverment is the employer.... so they decide wat the wage is

raising minimum wage increases the rate of inflation. politicians know this but a lot of them try to do it anyway because they know it will make them popular among the majority of americans who don't know what kind of damage they're doing.

Well Karl, FDR was an Episcopal. Very different from a Jew.


And that idea sounds pretty good. But in a nation with hundreds of millions of people, like the US, the government may not be able to find a job for everyone.

I'd happily take a job manufacturing cars than serving some vague white-collar job. Jobs like the former, well, I just feel like I'm doing something more than analyzing data.

Liveable wage = 1.9 (adjusted) $ each day, as said by WHO.

Does adjusted mean its in a country where you are used to getting no food and a burger (400? calories) costs that much, I don't think that's liveable.

As Donald Trump said, the best social program you can give someone, is a job. People who get a government job should be making minimum wage or somewhere around 8$ an hour, not 8$ in 4 days.

Heres the problem:

OBAMA IS ABSOLUTE SHIT AT MAKING JOBS.

And that idea sounds pretty good. But in a nation with hundreds of millions of people, like the US, the government may not be able to find a job for everyone.

It's not much a stretch, just encourage businesses to file openings in a database, and to check for matches when folk ask. If it's done for millions, it's not much a stretch to do it for hundreds of millions; at most, you could decentralise the process (not by states, though, since that would be very disproportional and is a dumb thought to hand anything to the states as they are now).

Liveable wage = 1.9 (adjusted) $ each day, as said by WHO.

Does adjusted mean its in a country where you are used to getting no food and a burger (400? calories) costs that much, I don't think that's liveable.

Just pretend it's the Big Mac index, and adjusted for how many Big Macs you can buy.

hasnt unemployment gone down under obama

A question for all the socialists/redistributionists/welfare statists - why do you like welfare? Is it for the "equality"? To punish the rich? To give everyone opportunity? I want to see your reasoning.

cus some ppl are unfortunate and need help