Lol now you're blaming a form of governance for the individual actions of some people. Well if we're going to be that retarded then republics are responsible for the 9 million German civilian casualties following ww2.
Kek, I see you can't find the connection between monarchs constantly fighting and them being rich monarchs ,who have never had to fight, or actually work, so they dedicate their careers to destroying and fighting.
>implying monarchs didn't fight with their men >Who are Richard the Lionheart and Emperor Maximillian of Mexico >Who are countless others I can't think of because I don't waste time studying individuals.
The vast majority of monarchs either piggy backed off of real generals, or stayed back and let them do as they want. Either way, they would not take lives with their hands the majority of the time.
>Be USA >Get into war every 10 yrs for the benefit of different special interests groups >Pay shills to defend you on a Taiwanese shirt sewing forum >Kek it up as you blow up a hospital from your comfy office in Virginia
Not seein a citation Smedley, also so what if they did? You defend republics and far fewer democratically elected leaders have died for their countries. wtf is your point?
What's my point? Kings are shit. So are presidents, and the other ruler types. Unrule > rule. Now back into your hole, before we get Simon Wiesenthal to hunt you down, little Nazi troll.
Karl, if the king does bad, and the people fail to overthrow him, then what?
What if the king takes away the right for people to overthrow or criticize the monarch? Then you're left as the Russian Empire- a few elites who are elite because they were the children of elites. And everyone else is a peasant.
All absolute monarchies are like this. They grow decadent, and slowly rot away. The Ottomans, Byzantines, the Romans, the Russians, the Spanish, the Austrians... all proud "western civilizations" (except for the Turks).
Great Britain was a constitutional monarchy. Grew into the largest empire in history. But became that way with a parliament. And in your mind, giving the common person any say leads to Jewish domination of a society, and letting those "filthy negros and Moors, and those buck-tooth gooks and Nips".
Absolute monarchies don't work. The few left today are backwards piles of shit. How much more different is your "monarchy" from an authoritarian Jew-Commie Regime?
- Both have one head of state wielding absolute pwoer - Both appoint people based on nepotism - Both will silence any opposition - Both think they have a divine/natural right to rule this way - Both leave most people living in a pretty sucky way.
But it's OK, of course, if it's a white doing these things. Because that's how Karl works. He's the white Gazi Kodzo. Look at the shit Gazi says, and Karl.
Karl, your own fears of the Negro monarchy promoting white genocide have created yourself your own enemies- a black supremacist with fear of a white monarchy promoting black genocide.
