<< Back to Off-topic Forum   Search

Posts 61 - 78 of 78   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 01:17:59


Жұқтыру
Level 56
Report
Can you be my father, you're so cool?

I'm an Ethiopian Zionist Jew, though, so not sure. My parents, they were an Israelite and a purebred German.
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 02:44:47


KCt4th
Level 20
Report
>Jew
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 02:46:19


Жұқтыру
Level 56
Report
>please?
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 02:52:37


KCt4th
Level 20
Report
derailing.
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 03:20:10


Жұқтыру
Level 56
Report
let's play a game, we've to rhyme off each other, like a rap battle, k?
you're failing.

Edited 6/1/2016 03:20:21
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 03:21:46


KCt4th
Level 20
Report
derailing Jew, 1 cent has been deposited into your paypal account.
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 03:22:45


Жұқтыру
Level 56
Report
moar
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 13:07:17


KCt4th
Level 20
Report
X you're showing yourself to be an autist.
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 17:09:54


Tchaikovsky Reborn
Level 41
Report


Edited 6/1/2016 17:12:00
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 17:18:01


KCt4th
Level 20
Report
Tchaicucksky can't even refute my arguments
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 17:18:38


Tchaikovsky Reborn
Level 41
Report
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 17:39:18


KCt4th
Level 20
Report
derailing
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 23:03:02


#The Prussian Job-Oh yeah, baby...
Level 51
Report
A well-regulated monarchy with some restrictions seems to be the best form of government. Democracy is plagued with lobbyists and huge corporations that can sway the peoples' vote on a whim. The majority of the population is not educated enough to vote. A monarch and a group of aristocrats, voted in by highly educated, property owning individuals, would defend personal liberty more than a democratic form of government.

An aristocracy would eliminate corruption in the government. If already wealthy people held power, they would not be enticed by lobbyists or bribes, they stand to gain nothing from betraying their people just to get a little extra money.

A monarch would be educated their whole life on how to rule, and royal family would ideally being (genetically) intelligent and fit to rule. A monarchy also has the benefit of knowing who is next in line for power, so power struggles are limited.

And Smedley you're wrong, and beginning to sound retarded. Kings have been historically better rulers than non-monarch dictators. There are a few bad examples as with any form of government. No system is perfect but a monarchy is the best system for preserving personal libert.



I have to agree. Parlamentarian Monarchy with some laws limiting the monarchs power and preventing retards at the throne and protecting democratic ideals and a well held aristocracy could work I believe. I would really love to immigrate into this country then.
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 23:25:25


#The Prussian Job-Oh yeah, baby...
Level 51
Report
Absolute monarchy is not working anymore; Only a newly reformed kind of monarchy will do with packages (or slices) of democracy, democratic socialism and capitalism included. Also it should be focused on progressive policies i.e. pro-LGBT-marriages, etc.
Monarchist thread: 6/1/2016 23:51:49


#The Prussian Job-Oh yeah, baby...
Level 51
Report
1. I agree that people will no longer go for an absolute monarchy but I am a traditionalist and am opposed to homosexuality, secularism, affirmative action, race-mixing etc. 2. I realize there may not be enough traditionalists to establish a monarchy that encourages traditional values but I would rather see the world burn than see it fall into the hands of 3rd worlders, progressives and communists.


First sentence of your statement: Well, I know, however nowadays traditionalism is vanishing, dieing out; And I do not fear it; Change is comming soon, the table´s turning....
To survive but also for intellectual survival it will be necessary to join ´em.
If you join them you will have to work for the progress, thus encouraging libertarianism.
Thus eradicating the last remnants of traditionalism...
Do not missundertand me, I ain´t communist nor traditionalist, however I have to agree to a commonly (/mutually) agreed on opinion if it increases democracy and provides the individuum with more liberties. Still, the best form of reign is the monarchy, thus you have to adopt this into the monarchy leading to the result that it has to be a parlamentarian monarchy since absolute monarchy has absolutely no support in the common folk ( At least in Europe ).
Thus you have to found a monarchy providing social reforms ( like the state health in Germany) and also including the enlarged liberties for the individuum.

Thus being said, I can not agree with your first sentence, but rather with your second sentence.


I do not fear the left winged extremists, nor the right winged extremists, nor the fundamentalists.
However, when they get a chance to be in power, they´ll use it, maybe also by force. Those groups are a hazard and have to be taken care of before they can commit any high treason. They have to get imprisoned or maybe even eradicated in the worst case ( I support a limited death penalty but no absolute capital punishment ).

Edited 6/1/2016 23:59:38
Monarchist thread: 6/2/2016 00:11:20


#The Prussian Job-Oh yeah, baby...
Level 51
Report
But monarchies have always provided greater liberty people are just ignorant on this subject.


Well, might be. It might be true. The problem with this hypothesis is the belief of the common folk to be ignorant and denying any alternative theories. This still is a huge problem which have to be worked on.
Monarchist thread: 6/3/2016 02:13:01


GeneralPE
Level 56
Report
thx 4 the book link i am looking order it now
Monarchist thread: 6/4/2016 17:42:39


#The Prussian Job-Oh yeah, baby...
Level 51
Report
Thank you for the book. I am looking forward to buy it.
Posts 61 - 78 of 78   <<Prev   1  2  3  4