nope, just discussing politics.

You were the one that mentioned economists....

No citation.

Playing the 'no citation' card, huh? Where are your citations along with your posts? Conveniently you get to ignore my entire point with a 'no citation' of course, as I am not surprised you did.

Not what I would classify as knowledge, a 30 second commercial about an interracial family eating cereal tells me nothing about the product and even if it did the average person wouldn't understand it.

So I guess firms are just willingly throwing their money into the drain then? Why does Nike pay billions of dollars for Ronaldo and Bolt to wear their sports shoes?

This is getting ridiculous.... I really have to go.

Edited 7/3/2016 14:40:29

Again you're a joke tbh, I mean what can we expect from someone who is in a clan entitled Maximus Trollitus.

You just lost all respect I had for you :(

How about this compromise: There are some people in the electorate that are low information/don't pay attention to politics.

I merely said that people who lack knowledge shouldn't make important decisions on which they lack knowledge.

However, anyone should be allowed to vote, low information or not, because censoring the votes of "low information" voters is a slippery slope that could lead to censoring of certain minorities or parties. This is assuming in this case that Prussian means "shouldn't vote" when he says "shouldn't make important decisions". If that's not what he meant then disregard everything I just said. Sound like a fair agreement to everything you two were arguing about?

They have to make political discussions like this illegal.

They have to make political discussions like this illegal.

But discussions like this, they encourage, uh, they encourage...
...
...
something good maybe?

Princes are addicted to conquest and glory, and will eventually bring the state into a failing war against a republic with masses of citizens who are invested in the republic. The monarchal/aristocratic state will not be able to mass arm peasants to fight the republic, because if they do, they won't be a aristocratic/monarchal state for long, and the republic will always have a numbers advantage and be able to replenish soldiers often.

This is less of a problem for modern monarchies, but they are less aristocratic in nature.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levée_en_masse

Mass conscription of the masses by a republic/non-aristocratic state, that ended in the defeat of around a dozen aristocratic states for around two decades and only ended because the non-aristocratic state got itself into a guerrilla war and blundered a invasion of a country.

Edited 7/3/2016 18:37:45

States are led by groups of folk, with the most notable person in a monarchy being the figurehead who is selected by virtue of birth. The other folk in these groups are often folk who have gotten to advisor status by ruthlessness and cunning, and thus are more violent than normal humans. They also have a large influence on the lives of these figureheads lives prior to them being powerful in any capacity, often reducing the autonomy of the figurehead, and allowing violent folk to simply turn the figureheads will in one direction , often violent.

If you need a example of how conscripted armies in aristocratic countries cause the downfall of the state, see the Russian Civil War.

But discussions like this, they encourage, uh, they encourage...

They encourage brain cancer.

Is that how you operate, Prussian? Claiming things like 'cherrypicking', 'no citations' at every opportunity you get?

If people make fallacies I call them out.

no shit, u r on this only now?

Hes an idiot, jew cousin. You know how THOSE kind of people are.

Edited 7/4/2016 14:09:49

"pl.1", "Player", "Harakiri" and "1416 - فيصل" are accounts of the same person, that person is Squiggles. He is circumventing suspension.

This was his account: https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=6442833779

Edited 7/4/2016 14:15:23

"pl.1", "Player", "Harakiri" and "1416 - فيصل" are accounts of the same person, that person is Squiggles. He is circumventing suspension.

+1. Hes got more accounts out there..

Yeah, though I think some topics started by some of them have finally vanished, which is why I can no longer track 'em down D:<

Prussian got suspended, how did that come about, eh?

still dodging my questions I see.

Pulsey, report "Radical Traditionalist", he is circumventing suspension.

You'd never dream of doing such a thing... would you?

still dodging my questions I see.

I have no idea why you keep repeating this all the time. I wasn't even talking to you and besides, what question?

Pulsey, report "Radical Traditionalist", he is circumventing suspension.

I would, although it says Karl is from UK and Radical is from Ohio.