<< Back to Off-topic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 20 of 35   1  2  Next >>   
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 17:24:01


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
Gahk, this is bloody annoying that so many folk think this.

1. The Red Army in and near Moskva would not be exhausted by the several counterattacks they staged in September otl.
2. The over a million soldiers in Kyiv and the Southwestern front would not be encircled without the 2nd army attack.
2a. This would overextend the right flank of the German advance on Moscow and could lead to a disaster for the Germans.
3. No matter where the Germans are, there will end up being ten new Russian Armies ready for a counterattack against the Germans, whether in Moscow or west of it.
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 17:28:19


Lolicon love
Level 56
Report
Who asked for this?
Who cares?
Can you not for once?
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 17:36:08


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
Who asked for your thread composed of cartoon women? Exactly, no one you weeb. Now go and try blowing up something in Northern Ireland, you Irish paedophile.
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 17:49:56


Genghis 
Level 54
Report
MGSB, as Loli's Centipede I must defend him from your frivolous accusations. Recline your assertions or you will be shunned.
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 18:03:09


Leibstandarte (Vengeance)
Level 45
Report
MGSB, i asked him to post that thread and i care about him/her.I do care about you too but not the way you want though, you attention whore.

Edited 7/10/2016 18:07:03
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 18:04:44


Fan the Apostle
Level 56
Report
Wtf
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 18:31:37


Moth
Level 51
Report
Mmmm yessss. The drama and hate pleases me.

+1
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 18:39:11


Leibstandarte (Vengeance)
Level 45
Report
All hail the glorious leader!
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 21:13:55


Eklipse
Level 57
Report
MGSB can create mass butthurt just by making one innocent thread.

+1. Please continue, I love watching people blow up over literally nothing.
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 21:16:07


Genghis 
Level 54
Report
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 21:28:25


Huitzilopochtli 
Level 57
Report
the 2nd army was the only thing stopping hitler from success !! ur wrong
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 21:32:24


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
^ that's more inbred than Charles II
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 21:39:48


Genghis 
Level 54
Report
^

v

Edited 7/10/2016 21:50:05
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/10/2016 21:47:09


Ox
Level 58
Report
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/11/2016 02:20:39


Rogue NK
Level 59
Report
Is this when Hitler personally intervened from the battle plans for Barbarossa and pulled troops from army group center to the south instead of pushing on Moscow? You are probably right but Germany still could have won had they brought along a few coats

EDIT: or the Japanese had attacked the Siberian armies, focusing their forces on Russia and quietly taking the Dutch East Indies.

Edited 7/11/2016 02:28:35
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/11/2016 02:22:45


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
Coats don't defend your vehicles and horses against the muddy season, nor you from Russian steel, lead and gunpowder.

And yes, this is when Hitler delayed the advance on Moscow a month.
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/11/2016 02:25:40


Rogue NK
Level 59
Report
At this point in the war Russian tanks were woefully out classed by German designs. Russia even had to stop production of war materials to move whole factories (workforce and all) from the heavily industrialized, overrun eastern Europe to Siberia.

Edited 7/11/2016 02:27:21
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/11/2016 02:29:37


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
You do realize that the Germans had serious issues penetrating T-34 and KV armor right? And still, it wasn't the winter that stopped the Germans at Moskva, it was most definitely the Red Army, considering the Germans did assault their lines and were still repelled.
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/11/2016 02:46:24


Rogue NK
Level 59
Report
I think you are overestimating the USSR's preparedness at the onset of the war. Their tank army largely consisted of BT-7s, T-40s, and T-26s. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_combat_vehicle_production_during_World_War_II)


While it was the Red Army that stopped them at Moscow, a number of things could have changed the course of the battle. It was the Siberian divisions brought over from Eastern Russia that tipped the balanced and allowed the USSR to counterattack. If Japan had at least confronted these divisions then the USSR counterattack would have failed.

Additionally, as I have stated before, if the Germans had been prepared for the winter then they would have easily beaten back the Soviet counter offensive as both sides have roughly the same number of men and tanks (after the Siberian divisions were taken into account).

Edited 7/11/2016 02:50:11
No, not diverting the 2nd army wouldn't win WW2: 7/11/2016 02:57:55


Lolicon love
Level 56
Report
you have so much in common then.
Posts 1 - 20 of 35   1  2  Next >>