If we implemented your ideologies you would have these groups as enemies

Fascists

National Socialists

Conservatives

REAL Secularista

REAL Liberals

Probably all Muslims worldwide

Communists

Socialists

Almost ALL parens worldwide

that equals to what? 6.5 billion atleast? You're just an extremist potential terroist with no idea about anything.

Get out.

EDIT : to Squiggles

Edited 8/22/2016 00:27:51

Doesn't change the fact they would be against you. It's like expecting a hungry lion to not eat you just because you are a vegeterian.

Edited 8/22/2016 00:29:32

Tell that to Mohammad the pedopile.

8 June 632 Best day for Humanity.

Ataturk brought turkey from the evils of Islam to the great civilization that is the west

1416 give one example of how Ataturk wasbad

Yeah, i don't like your policies but that doesnt mean we cant talk, my best friend is a communist while i am monarchist, i just got offended slightly when you brought Atatürk into the talk. I mean if you insult Atatürk in a very-Kemalist place in Turkey people would beat you to a pulp and the police would not interfere as long as they are not trying to kill you

Edited 8/22/2016 00:38:13

also I dont deny the Armenian genocide

Mohammad the pedophile shit and piss be upon him had sex with a 9 year old.

Also, do you deny the slaughters by the islam? You never answered my question

I can't shut you down but say that in İzmir and people will shut you down so hard that you would wish Islam never existed.

Sure, it's a great city, just don't go to small Islamist streets and stay away from Tourist traps (Tourist traps are worldwide so you should know what to avoid)

Yes, any kind of political islam is bad. State has no religion but people can worship whatever they want, thus Secularism is best.

I mean you can worship farts that come from 50 year old woman for all i care, as long as you dont breach the law human rights i will respect you and your religion.

Islam has dangerous views but whenever somebody acts on those beliefs its suddenly not Islam

"The Armenian genocide was probably the greatest Islamist act in nature since Greeks and Assyrians were killed too."

It was Islamic. The Ottomans were muslims. The Turkish nationalists are also great.

[4.74] Therefore let those fight in the way of Allah, who sell this world's life for the hereafter; and whoever fights in the way of Allah, then be he slain or be he victorious, We shall grant him a mighty reward. [4.75] ...fight in the way of Allah... [4.76] Those who believe fight in the way of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in the way of the Satan. Fight therefore against the friends of the Satan... [4.77] ...when fighting is prescribed for them...Our Lord! why hast Thou ordained fighting for us?...

just to be clear what sect of islam do you believe in

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

He believes in the ISIS sect.

what fucking sect are you in shia or sunni