| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/12/2016 02:34:11 |
fdas
Level 57
Report
|
Should sanctioning someone count as an attack.
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/12/2016 02:41:50 |
[FCC] CBerkley10
Level 51
Report
|
It truly is just what the host thinks, its all personal preference. If the sanction is huge and hurts a lot, I would say yes, but if it is small over a duration of a couple turns, I would say no.
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/13/2016 16:13:19 |
ViralGoat 
Level 60
Report
|
hell yes
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/13/2016 19:19:59 |
[REGL] Pooh
Level 62
Report
|
If its negative, then no.
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/13/2016 19:59:47 |
gilead k'nights
Level 41
Report
|
It's like a country sending in a spy. It's only an act of war if you get caught and it's only a blatant act of war if everybody knows about it.
It sounds like somebody ninja'd you. lol
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/14/2016 00:20:49 |
fdas
Level 57
Report
|
Everyone knew about it. Does that make it a blatant act of war?
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/14/2016 00:35:44 |
gilead k'nights
Level 41
Report
|
In my limited experience I would say that depends on the diplo.
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/14/2016 02:06:59 |
E Masterpierround
Level 57
Report
|
I would say that even if it isn't a declaration of war it is very clear casus belli.
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/14/2016 08:35:25 |
Ambasador
Level 55
Report
|
I think that a host who decides to allow sanctions in a diplo game (which really messes up the gameplay in my humble opinion), should specify it.
|
| Sanction cards as diplos: 10/14/2016 11:01:59 |
Dutch Desire
Level 60
Report
|
EU sanctioning Russia dousen't count as an attack, so why would it count as an attack in a diplo?
Edit: thx Pooh I dident know negative sections was posible, that is way more convinent in diplo's.
Edited 10/14/2016 11:08:25
|