http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/07/10/general-michael-flynn/

Opinions?

Even if he isn't a non-interventionist, he's defintely a helluva lot better than a Neo-Con, and this shows that Trump will have a better foreign policy than Clinton, who seemed to have taken notes from Hitler.

I thought Neocons were libertarians in favor of deregulations and free trade?

Neocons are like Bush or Clinton, bad foreign policy, economically interventionist, and like legislating morality.

Edited 11/17/2016 23:38:01

Weak. Because they still loved deregulations, flat taxes and free trade. Libertarian principles that cannot be ignored. In contrast Trump is a protectionist bitch that heavily opposes free trade. Doesn't that trigger you?

trigger

MGSB is an ancap, not a feminist

"Free trade" said the blind man

Even if they supposedly believed in those things, in practice, they're not that good at keeping to those beliefs. Bush defintely wasn't. Besides, there's more to libertarianism than just being less interventionist in the economy, and the neocons who are interventionist outside of the country and interventionist in social policies defintely don't match up with libertarianism in ideology, and defintely not in practice.

Bringing Down the Globalist Monster

it's called a gonyrch, it has three heads, and breathes fire.

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/141057-news-march-7-2016

First thing to show up when I search Gonyrch

Smedley's flirtation with Trump gets more cancerous with every post.

The man isn't the worst pick, but there many other better candidates. He's just using the spoils system. Lets pray to God he gets someone relatively normal for Secretary of State.

First thing to show up when I search Gonyrch

Gorynycz* I see I have been spelling this wrong too much.

Looked it up, great serpent, would be an ideal national security adviser