https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=12675340

looks like someone couldn't handle losing to someone rated less than him

Don't be either guy.


They both play like ass.

You're at least new though, he has no excuse.

Edited 1/11/2017 16:43:03

im not talking about how we played, im talking about making up excuses for losing that make no sense

I know, I'm just an ass :P

I will however agree with you, his only excuse for losing is being bad. He just hasn't noticed yet somehow.

level =/= skill

all counterarguments are cringe

Semice deciding what's cringe and what isn't? How ironic.

Even with sub-par picks and sorta-sloppy play I still had an easy win over him as well
https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=12586554

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=8378971

ezpz

Haha wow seems like his go to excuse, how sad

I think I know why he's bad. He used to (don't know if he still does) play lottery games. The only common games I have with him are 30-31 FFA lottos from 08/08/2014.

To be fair he does have a very good 1v1 record, he's probably just used to winning and throws a tantrum when things go wrong for him

Winrate means absolutely nothing. This guy isnt used to winning actual games, just used to beating noobs.

yes it does

1v1: 812 / 1458 (56%)

like for an example anyone with a winrate of 56% or above should be able to take 1st on 1v1 ladder

Edited 1/12/2017 13:47:40

1v1: 206 / 432 (48%)

Semice was rank 1 with 56% 1v1, I was rank 3 with 48% 1v1, ignore winrates. That guys bad, he might have won 73% of his games, but he'd lose 95% vs. me or semice.

Who you play matters much more than how often you win.

There's a common theme in every game linked in this thread. The guy doesn't know how to pick, and he clusters in every game. It's a losing strategy.

if win rate isn't over 70% then I don't want to talk to you noobs.

if you read closely you can see he said *1st* on ladder. LOL !! better get 56% win rate Nuzzleboar