Or ethnic only. Europe is a homeland of Europeans.
In my Utopian world all nation states will be republics. Others can visit and sometimes reside in these nation states if the nation states believe their presence is beneficial. However the interests of the majority group is above all.
I also believe there should be cosmopolitan countries for cosmopolitan people such as myself. Cosmopolitan countries use purely non-ancestry-based criteria to select who to admit. I believe that the cosmopolitan countries should be located in Africa. We can just sign an agreement with an African ruler, agreeing to help defend or develop his/her nation. In return they need to cede some land to us.
So someone who is known to be anti-diversity, anti-islam, and anti-appeasing migrants, makes a post talking appeasing Islamic migrants by making the monarchy more diverse, and you simply assume it to be truthful in intention because it is not 'well thought out'? Tsh, no, you just don't have any wits, and thus cannot understand parody, bantz or memeing. Even Tabby has more wits than you.
^Not really. I'm actually against nation states. However some people (not me though) need a tribal homeland.
As long as there is still freedom of emigration (aka anyone who hates the culture of his/her family can leave the country forever) I don't see any problem. Nation states are in the category of necessary evils. They should only exist for one reason, namely to escape from persecution.
Ex: Poland exists so that people who either call themselves Poles or get called Poles can find a place of refuge if non-Poles begin to persecute Poles.
Germany exists so that people who either call themselves Germans or get called Germans can find a place of refuge if non-Germans begin to persecute Germans.
Vietnam exists so that people who either call themselves Vietnamese or get called Vietnamese can find a place of refuge if non-Vietnamese begin to persecute Vietnamese.
Iran exists so that people who either call themselves Persians or get called Persians can find a place of refuge if non-Persians begin to persecute Persians.
I would prefer that most of these ethnic labels cease to exist. However as long as they continue to exist people that get labelled, willingly or unwillingly, need a place of refuge.
As for small minority groups that do not have their nation states they should have autonomy.
Cosmopolitans and individualists who do not conform to traditional cultures should also have a place of refuge (called Felinia, Freedomia, Individualburg or whatever) to protect them from collectivism.
Again the keys are "absolute freedom of emigration" and "freedom of disassociation". Nations can restrict immigration but should never restrict emigration. No nation should lock its citizens within its borders like prisoners.
For example I don't care if you have an Islamic religious nation as long as everyone who does not want to live there can get out. Yes this includes religious dissidents and women. You can ban people from entering but you should not be able to ban people from escaping.
They should not be allowed to isolate if they harm the ecosystem too much they are living in. Nature does not care for borders. They are free to leave for annother planet and do their shit on a dead rock.