The exorciation's been overdue.
So I suggest you read carefully "(((Tabby Juggernaut)))". I'll begin with something obvious. Prosperity of a culture/race hinges on a whole lot more than "these guys are A ethnicity" and win 48 Nobel prizes each year while "these guys are B ethnicity" and haven't won any; "A ethnicity must be a better folk than B.".
Secondly, I do not *intend* to incite an angry response from you, but you have a short temper. Folk vary much more by their own genes rather than by Y-DNA haplogroups or cultures or ethnoses. Eugeny is essentially the not-braindead version of what you are upholding, since it actually focused on making humanity freer from genetic illnesses in a great lack of evolution. Where eugeny gets criticism though is the ideologies and the means historically behind it (being a bad bloodline = hereditary illness? forced castrations, abortions, bad stuff).
Thirdly, I don't care what the "internet slang" is, I speak and write formally and avoid talking informal. Therefore, I wish that you do not use phrases such as "topmew" or "mewlmao" or "16/318", as these are not words I understand at all. And I speak 5 languages !
Fourthly, I'm not extraneous when I post MARIO Clan get-together invites on the Rational Discussion PM thread. Teaching and practising safe sex, learning the science of homemade cocaine, and reading about how to build a homemade assault rifle are related to the goal of the mail thread called "Rational Discussion PM". One guest recently was recently arrested for lack of firearm experience in a shootout with the police, that guest is named "Onny-Chan".
Fifthly, you don't have knowledge of the unseen. Only ALLAAH has knowledge of the unseen, so perhaps you should go to Abuja before claiming it to be "Blacks but the good kind" and a role model for Detroit. Your only proof for most things 's as bad as or perhaps even worse than Pauger's proof for his scientific racism - citing a fellow-in-work you have in a Boston school is most often as the case for praising a whole ethnos, like the mythic "Nigerian" ethnos. And Paugers does the same but he has less (diverse) friends than Tabby and so just looks at what random folk are doing on Facebook and when he sees some blackskin doing something silly or bad or gross, he adds that to the list of "proof that the blackskins are bad".
But at least even Paugers will try to back up his claims with data instead of going the Tabby way of proof by telling folk "go to a Nigerian church, you will see for yourself how good the Nigerians are" (https://i.snag.gy/2Lkg7c.jpg
I've detected a bit of cognitive dissonacne from Tabby. The only real data Tabby has ever tried to prove Jews to be great is by saying that Israel wins a lot of Nobel Prizes proportional to its population. Which's true (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Nobel_laureates_per_capita
). Even if that is a way of sizing how good a nationality is (let alone a whole faith!), though, the obvious conclusion to take from this list is that Swedes are more than twice as good as the Israelites yet I've never seen Tabby shilling for the Nords as the master race.
Tabby, may ALLAAH guide you, amin.