Not sure why we had back to back seasons with this setting, but I am sick of it. Games are SO slow and there is far less strategy (outside picking). I am skipping any LD I see, I am burnt out on it.

I can see how it'd be bad for a season, but it's fun to play around with. I have to disagree tho, as it made me think even harder when I tried it. So, personally, I feel it's more strategic, but it does drag out the game.

i agree. Fizzer, no more LD!!!!

i can see why some folks like it but i agree with chris, got tired of LD after that first season. more like never really got into it for real.

Lol you actually made a forum post about this XD. Well I can agree that local deployments are starting to get old,I wouldn't sayit's les strategic. Would I be able to place in the top 10 for these three local deployment seasons if it wasn't strategic? Haha

idea, what if local deployment combined with a new feature of 5-territories-range of transfer?

I think it is a good setting to have. It is critical for my map. But, not in back to back seasons. I think it should be used on seasonal every 3rd or 4th time only maybe. The tedious nature of it makes it more likely to take away interest IMO.

+1

also.. Maybe Fun map besides ME... at least MME

Local Deployment and Multi-attack work well together imho, as it's much harder to accumulate large armies.
If there was a way to limit multi-attack to a fixed amount of attacks in a row, it would be great.