Hi everyone,

The recommended way to give feedback on and suggest new features for WarLight is by posting on [UserVoice](http://warlight.uservoice.com/). Somehow, I get the idea not too many people ever look there. So, if you've never been there, click the link, log in (with the same email you use on WL itself) and spend some votes on ideas you like.

Really short manual:

- You get 10 votes
- You can give a maximum of 3 of your votes to a single idea
- You automatically get your votes back when Fizzer marks an idea as either implemented or not-going-to-implement
- You can also remove votes from an idea if you run out and rather spend them on another idea

---

Okay, that being said, the default sorting UserVoice uses is by number of votes, so the ideas which already have lots of votes will show first (thus getting ever more votes), "hiding" ideas which might be very good, but so far have received few votes.

After looking through a lot of ideas, I found a bunch (both by me and others) which have few votes, but which I think deserve a lot more. Of course you don't have to vote for these, I just want to highlight them; you should only vote for these (or others) if you think they are good ideas:

- [Add "Play on This Map" button to "Preview Maps" screen](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/2630327)
- [Add buttons to jump Orders to the top/bottom of the order list](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1372155)
- [Continous Map Scroll](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/2278237)
- [Colour-code attack-only / transfer-only / attack-or-transfer orders during Attack/Transfer Phase](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/2650255)
- [Easier access to the "Analyze" panel](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1167313)
- ["Preview Orders" button in Confirmation Phase](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/2650223)
- [Skip watching deployment but watch everything else](http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/2082375)

(Yes, I know half those ideas are by me; that's not because I'm so clever, that's because I post ideas I think are good. Then when I make this post, obviously those same ideas are going on the list of ideas I think are good. :p )

And finally, if you have any other ideas, just post them on UserVoice! (If you could search a little to make sure your idea is not there yet that would be great; having a lot of duplicates doesn't really help matters.)

Lol, I'm gonna take the high road and not put a plug for my ideas here ;)

I do think that more people should use Uservoice though, because it's the main way Fizzer gets feedback about the game, and the general direction that we as players would like it to move in.

As an "anti-plug" I guess, I would like to advise everyone NOT to vote for the Android or iPhone apps, as they're already being developed (alpha stage) and those votes would just be wasted.

+1

i used all my votes time a go

If you have used all of your votes, I would still suggest you go through and check out newer things, you might just find somewhere better for them to be :D

I dont understand why this link is secret? Why this link is not on home page of warlight?

I have found it now.......still ......it can be more visible.

Ability to use troops elsewhere, if an "attack only" results in no attack:

http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1091255-stacking-conditional-attacks-option-e-g-attack-o

Completely against last one. Why to give huge advantage to attack against defence? There is no balance this way. Balance to this is.....if attack is here put my armies there....if not put them somewhere else. And this is stupid.

Humana, I almost guarantee that will not be implemented...

primarily because it *used to work that way* and Fizzer changed it to the current format.

Personally, I think Fizzer should re-implement the Suggesstions Forum, and then create a sticky in that forum that links to uservoice.. it has been made obvious *-in my mind at least-* that people will continue to post their ideas to this forum, with or without the suggesstions forum.. this forum gets more traffic, and as previously mentioned, the uservoice can be difficult to find..

+1 Perrin.