Okay I've recntly discoverd that my big mexico map has a lot of territory connection errors, and I mean a lot. So I would some testers. I would like this to be a 24 ffa, but I would settle for 12 ffa. Let me know if you want to test.
http://warlight.net/SinglePlayer.aspx?PreviewMap=16667

Also do you think I should keep the ports. I'm taking votes to see. So let me know

I would make the connection with the ports more obvious. In general they are nessecary in my opinion.

I would be up for a FFA on that map :)

http://warlight.net/Forum/Thread?ThreadID=3976&Offset=40

more connection errors

Inde (Northern Durango) - San Bernardo (Northern Durango)
Cardenas (Western San Luis Potosi) - Lagunillas (Western San Luis Potosi)
Yajalon (Northern Chiapas) - Teopisca (Northern Chiapas)
Rio Grande (Northern Zacatecas) - El Plateado de Joaquin Amaro (Central Zacatecas)
Huazalingo (Southern Hidalgo) - Omitlan de Juarez (Southern Hidalgo)
Acajete (Northern Puebla) - Hueytlalpan (Northern Puebla)
Toliman (Queretaro) - El Marques (Queretaro)
Ciudad Fernandez (Eastern San Luis Potosi) - Cerro de San Pedro (Central San Luis Potosi)
　　　　　|
El Mante (Southern Tamaulipas)
Gomez Farias (Southern Jalisco) - Mazamitla (Southern Jalisco)

thx

I will like to help test.

I'd keep the ports, but not have them all connect to each other, but instead only connect to one or two other ports.
And use a small anchor logo instead of these weird peninsulas.

The link says this map does not exist.
And I'll test.

Sorry new link http://warlight.net/SinglePlayer.aspx?PreviewMap=15944

I'm also in for testing.
And I also think you should fix the coast of Florida.