I am looking for a clan in warlight.
I am :
born a child prodigy
strategical genius
modest

does not compute

i hear regl accepts anyone, if not, then join apex, they are a very weak clan and will take you

He's 1/1, that's 100%, that's good enough for any clan, definitely too good for REGL, you should talk to ReLite, I think that's the minimum requirement they have, 100%+ win rate.

My winratio based on one game is susceptible to change.
should I play only the two best players of this site, it would drop to more or less 50%
should I play only the best 10 players it would be about 60% to 65%
beyond that it would reach about 70%-80% playing only the top 20 to 30/40

So I will join the clan that can beat me 35% to 50% of the try out games i play with it.
If i beat them more often than 65% of our games, I see no reason in joining.
If they beat me more often than 50% they should see no reason of letting me in.
Of cource variance should be considered achieved through game analysis or bigger number of games.

also you water is irradiated.

Billy? Is that you?

He's 1/1, that's 100%, that's good enough for any clan, definitely too good for REGL, you should talk to ReLite, I think that's the minimum requirement they have, 100%+ win rate.

Now now now, we're not that strict.
Furthermore saying that 100% win rate would get you automatic access to our alliance is also not correct.
For in this case the 100% says nothing.
Anyone with even a semblance of scientific training will understand that you need at least a good sample size (in the case of warlight this would be 300-400 games minimally)in order to give a good representation of reality (in this case his warlight skills).

Apart from that, we appreciate teamplay and communication skills just as much as we look at the stats. The fact that he hasn't played any 2vs2 or 3vs3 games would have proven to be a reason not to accept him.

Finally 100% is too much. More or less it is 60-70% minimum in 1vs1,2vs2 AND 3vs3. Variations upon this requirement are discussed in the team as a whole by way of voting for/against a certain player to join.

While we don't mind confidence/arrogance in a player to a certain degree we certainly are not looking to enlist Mad Max in our alliance.
If he's played 300+ games, knows how to play with other players and tones down his flaming a bit we might give it another consideration if he's managed to maintain the claims he's making here.

He must be playing top players atm, his winrate dropped to 50% :(

Apparently neither OP or Aranka understand sarcasm....

Taking things over the top and deadpan serious is just something I found out to be a good antidote against trolls [REGL]Eagleblast :D

Now that is why you take yourself drop dead serious then, Aranka.

Mr. Scorched Earth
Sadly no, I didnt play top players, the teamgames I lost were just impossible to win. Nobody could have won them.
The games I played in 1on1 were just players like you, 50% something to 60% something winrate ... people who think they can play, but there is a gap between them and truely good players.