Should be simple. Should be done. Levels mean zilch, so why not list players by current ladder rank instead? It'll encourage people to actually stay around on the 1v1 ladder, and it'll help replace the myth that a high-leveled player is worth more than a lower-level player who actually knows 1v1.

Edited 7/11/2015 19:58:04

Hey, i first suggested this in another thread. Some cred please?

It wasn't officially refused by Fizzer, so it doesn't count :D

Awwww man.

But many people wont have any 1x1 ranking and wht then? Additionally - some people prefer 2x2 ladder. So if sb is no1 in 2x2 ladder and has a rather poor score in 1x1, the he should be listed at the very end? And other ladders as well?

But this problems may be handled. And the system that prefers levels in indeed handicaped. There are masses of players that have upbeated their points on stupid lotterys and still they dont know how to play.

Edited 7/11/2015 22:27:18

But many people wont have any 1x1 ranking and wht then?

Simple. They get sorted by level below the people ranked. Or alphabetically.

So if sb is no1 in 2x2 ladder and has a rather poor score in 1x1, the he should be listed at the very end?

The 2v2 ladder does not show individual merit, so why should it have an influence on an individual's rank in a clan? As for the other ladders, the real-time ladder and seasonal ladders have fewer players ranked on any given day, compared to the 1v1 ladder, so if a ladder is to be chosen, the 1v1 ladder is the most inclusive.

This isn't relevant enough to warrant an update. And I think fizzer will agree.

Most people aren't in the ladders or clans.

Wake up. I always agree with you, FK, except about the important of ladders.

I prefer ladder score to lvl, but the 2v2 ladder question is more relevat than you think. Many ppl join clans in order to be able to play in teams


anyway, why are you so worried about the place where your name appears in irrelevante list?