But I do not understand the term used in 4th point: "Standardization of bonuses", and neither what you mean in 5th. Where you derive the opinion that your called optimal and decent starting spots "afford to have more starting positions". I do not see the clear derivation between them.
Stardarized bonus = every territory that have X territory will Always have Y income. Example: 3 territory 2 income, 4=3, 5=4 etc. not posible have a territory of 3 with 2 incopme and another one with +1. This what it meant.
If every territory have same ratio teritory/income, is very balanced and is better have more starting position for overall coverage, as it isn't clear 10=% which spot coould be better, and counter picks is major part of the game probably.
The goal of a ladder should be the better players win. Otherwise dont call it a ladder, call it a league.
yeah
Oh, and right now the 2v2 ladder is healthy in terms of number of active teams, compared to what it used to be. Makes it hard to convince Fizzer that there is need for change, no?
lol ok, quantity over quality :(
i don't remember a so weak ladder, with 1700s being ion top 10.