Judging from your evasive answer "many others" it seems you do not know at all any other campaign ideas rather than the Mexican wall and the Muslim ban

I said the wall and the ban because they are the only two policies I have discussed here on these forums. Even if I REALLy didn't know his other policies, don't you think I could have done a quick search on google, so how is it evasive? Lowering coporate tax rate, lowering income tax, closing loopholes on rich, ending foreign currency manipulation, Veteran support, do I have to go on? This is a new low from you.

Trump is conveying messages of fear and hatred, much more like any far right political leaders, so tell me how this can be respectable?

Did you not read my previous message where I justified some of his appeal? Last paragraph. I just answered your question and you just wholly ignored it.

Edited 1/27/2016 00:23:48

Why then are you arguing about something you do not master at all? If you do not even know what are the main ideas of Trump's program? Your evasive "many other ideas" just confirmed it earlier, this is chrystal clear.

Your answer is again totally irrelevant, I asked you how could this be respectable, and you answer me with a total nonsense. Try better next time.

success in the private sector does not mean someone knows how to manage the economy of a nation

If you do not even know what are the main ideas of Trump's program? Your evasive "many other ideas" just confirmed it earlier, this is chrystal clear.

I already told you your false and entirely baseless assumption was wrong. I explained already why I only mentioned 2 of his policies but you chose to ignore that and accuse me of the same label again. There really is no point arguing with you.

And I noticed you yet again ignored my justification to Trump's appeal. Which is funny since you are calling my answers 'totally irrelevant'.

You really are a lousy 'debater', to use your own word. This is not the first time I've said this - You make simple points with absolutely no supporting argument, and when I produce a counter argument thats not part of your intended script, you proceed to either a) accuse me of 'truncating' or 'inventing' words OR b) ignore the counterargument altogether and make the exact same point again.

My opinion is you are either retarded or you are too lazy to actually read what I write, think outside the box and come up with a logical response. Too many of my arguments with you are about petty personal attacks rather than discussion on actual issues and Policies.

Edited 1/27/2016 12:25:33

Pulsey the Hypocrite is back, you say I ignore your comments but guess what, you were the first one here to continuously ignore my own comments, hypocrisy without limit.

You are not even able to dialogue seriously, once someone is against your biased view of things, you try to avoid the debate by insulting your opponent childishly with "retarded" (me) or "birth defect" (Hitchslap). Pathetic behavior really Pulsey, but that does not surprise me anymore. You're only digging yourself in deeper and you are not even realizing it.

You seriously lack of objectivity every time you are participating in this forum obviously blinded by your own biased view. You wont win any debate this way you know, since you are the one here failing to answer any questions (and quite simple questions tbh), and not having any solid argumentation with any valuable sources, God stop being an idiot Pulsey and try to reason by yourself instead of constantly looking for useless confrontations.

This thread made me look up whether cancer is contagious.

nazis.....nazis everywhere.

You wont win any debate this way you know

You don't "Win" an internet debate. The best you can hope for is a civil discussion that enlightens different solutions, usually doesn't work out that way though....

you win an internet debate when your opponent calls you a nazi.

Sh*t Lolicon must be right... I am defeated then :(

And Eklipse in my opinion this applies for any kind of debates, but again I must be wrong.

Godwin's law is what it's called.

And your response basically matched for the third time the point I was making...

I'm done.

I love the forums. I can taste the salt.

Speaking of Godwin's law:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3420430/He-Hitler-Anne-Frank-s-stepsister-survived-Auschwitz-compares-Donald-Trump-Nazi-dictator.html

I partially agree, but you NEVER play the Nazi card. Ever. Even if you suffered from them.

Pulsey, this is for you:

"stubborn and ardent clinging to one's opinion is the best proof of stupidity"

- Michel de Montaigne, French philosopher

Pulsey has been upset. We had better call a WAHHHMBULANCE.

Edited 1/28/2016 14:29:16

I really don't know if you are trolling or your English or intellectual ability is unable to understand what I write. Because I make the same point repeatedly and every time it seems to be completely ignored and you repeat the same thing again. Its like talking to a wall, its really amazing.

Please don't be too hard on Angry Koala. He's just living up to his name: angry, mean-spirited, unreasonable.