I think he was referring to your rant on Trump-bashing correctly. Anyway, time to refute: "Went bankrupt 4 times"
Wrong, 4 of his business ventures went bankrupt. And no matter what you say, any self-made billionaire has to have a damn good business sense. If you get a million dollars and make it to 10 billion, we can talk.

The immigrant one: he talks about ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, not ones who do it right. All those people you listed show he has nothing against immigrants, just the illegal ones.

http://www.alternet.org/story/156234/exposing_how_donald_trump_really_made_his_fortune%3A_inheritance_from_dad_and_the_government's_protection_mostly_did_the_trick

Team Guns, if you generally think the website your quoting from is anywhere near subjective, your crazy.

Fine, I'm gonna find more sources that destroy the idea that trump is a successful businessman.


http://indy100.independent.co.uk/article/it-turns-out-donald-trump-would-actually-be-richer-now-if-hed-done-nothing-since-1974--b1lhFdzt_g

"It turns out Donald Trump would actually be richer now if he'd done nothing since 1974"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nelson-dong/debunking-donald-trump_b_8309012.html

"And for those who argue that Trump's business prowess makes him a prime candidate for the presidency, know that several of the companies that bear his name have declared bankruptcy. Trump, however, denies having declared bankruptcy himself though many reports claim that he has been.
[...]
Trump made it big because of his inheritance and financial boosts from the government, survived because of bailouts, and continued to build the entire facade by stepping on people and selectively excluding the multiple outside factors that led to his ridiculous wealth."

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/090215/how-donald-trump-became-rich.asp

"Success was not always easy for Trump or his businesses. The Trump Organization famously revealed it was $5 billion in the hole in 1990, with as much as $1 billion guaranteed by Donald personally. The business survived thanks to a combination bailout / deferment by more than 70 banks."

Edited 3/6/2016 03:40:56

Oh yeah! My Trump Bashing Done Correctly rant.

-The type of bankruptcy filed for by his four companies (out of over 500) wasn't even true bankruptcy.

-He hates illegal immigrants, not Mexicans.

Now I leave you back to your devices.

Guys, if you want to piss off authoritarian progressives big time, you know who to vote. This thread is but one piece of evidence among millions.

Yea, big difference. If you're a white immigrant comming from western europe looking for a job in america, you're a legal immigrant.

If you're a latino immigrant comming from central america fleeing from misery and drug cartels, you better be kicked out of dat country!

It's a bad sign you lack a good argument on issues of immigration if your first recourse is to pull the race card.

So, I'll correct you. If you're an immigrant, country of origin irrelevant, who enters the country through a proper legal channel and follows the laws towards becoming a citizen, you are a legal immigrant.

If you disregard all legal authority and just skirt across the border, you are an illegal immigrant.

Race is not the issue. This is a matter of law and security.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZrNFgJeSOw

Eklipse he is an sjw he must use the race card any chance he gets in order to seem mildly credible. Without the race card everything he says holds no water. Even with the race card it still holds little water because he presumes there is still systemic racism.

^^I'm not even mad, that was quite clever.

Edited 3/6/2016 05:22:25

Obama for president, third time. He's not perfect, but probably way better than the others.

@Eklipse {TJC}

No, you're missing the issue. Origin (not really race btw, but close), is the main way to choose which people can go to america and live there or not.

And it's easy to explain by my own situation. I'm a brazilian, if I wanted to go to the us and work, it would be really hard and bureaucratic to do it, specially if you are poor. But it doesn't matter to me, because 1, I'm not poor, 2, I'm also french, so I could go to the US anyway.

Doesn't it seem weird to you that it's easy to emigrate to the US if I'm european, but almost impossible if I'm a brazilian? But yea, let's keep saying there's no prejudice envolved on it ^^.

The "proper" channels of immigration are really a complete mess impossible to pursue for a mexican, if it was as easy as you say no one would enter the us as an illegal don't you think?


@Жұқтыру

Having someone occupying the highest post on the nation for an unlimited time is really a bad thing. I don't agree Obama should have a third term.


@Semicedevine and other trump supporters

I'm not trying to convince you not to vote for him, do whatever the heck you want. I don't give a damm, this thread is just for fun. But he won't be a good president, be sure of it, at the end of the day it's your country, play with fire at your will lol.

@The Lord



Authoritarian progressivism is an idea so un-real and false that even wikipedia doesn't have a page for it. Trust me, I searched for it.

#Alienation #Foxnews #Bullshit

Edited 3/6/2016 08:57:08

^Interesting graph. But the poll is only conducted among GOP supporters, many of whom like his claims to build a wall and keep Muslims out (he's going to do neither). Trump has a lot of support among independents and democrats too, and they are probably supporting him for different reasons than GOP hardliners.

Trump has more support among Muslims than the rest of the GOP field combined. Similar with hispanics. You cannot claim with a straight face that they support him because they want to see all Muslims banned, can you?

Authoritarian progressivism is an idea so un-real and false that even wikipedia doesn't have a page for it. Trust me, I searched for it.

You just looked at the wrong place. A present example of authoritarian progressivism is the social justice movement. Another is Black Lives Matter. Their rhetoric might differ from the KKK, but their goal is the same: supremacy based on skin color, gender etc.

Both Hillary and Bernie pander to these authoritarians. It's funny how Trump's disavowal of David Duke was allegedly not emphatetic enough, but nobody bats an eye when Democrats openly support authoritarian supremacy movements.

Historical examples of authoritarian progressivism: fascism, nazi'ism, communism.

http://www.bustle.com/articles/131835-the-9-most-sexist-donald-trump-quotes-from-2015-are-honestly-just-the-tip-of-the

Trump unarguably made sexist insults.

http://cdn.mamamia.com.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/10145224/Donald-Trump-tweet-Hillary-Clinton.png

Really awful

Trump is foul-mouthed, I won't argue that. I don't particularly like it but it doesn't make me not support him.

But misogynist? No. Trump is an equal opportunity offender, and I don't see why women should be treated with kid gloves. The whole idea is sexist.

Origin (not really race btw, but close), is the main way to choose which people can go to america and live there or not.

I want some proof of this, because I'm pretty darn sure immigration laws are the same regardless of what country you're coming from. It's always the same procedure for becoming a citizen.

You might be able to make an argument that the current immigration systems makes it easier for the wealthier to get in, but race? No.

But yea, let's keep saying there's no prejudice envolved on it ^^.

I will, because you've provided no proof of prejudice. Show me how a dirt poor European would somehow be able to immigrate to the U.S easier than a dirt poor Mexican, Brazilian, or whatever....

if it was as easy as you say no one would enter the us as an illegal don't you think?

I never said it was easy, but immigration checks and controls exist for a reason. If it was easy to get in, than terrorists and drug cartels would be able to penetrate the border in even greater amounts than they do already.

It's not an easy process, but it's very possible to do. If people can't bother themselves to wait in line and follow the law like thousands of immigrants before them successfully did, than they don't belong here.

On that note, tell me, if the current system is racist against Hispanics, how have so many Hispanics already immigrated to the U.S legally? I think the vast number of that demographic is living proof that legally entering the U.S is quite possible and those coming illegally don't have as much excuse as people try to make up for them.

Yeah, nobody is saying he hates men because he insults Rubio.
"Doesn't it seem weird to you that it's easy to emigrate to the US if I'm european, but almost impossible if I'm a brazilian? "
No, it isn't odd. Because Europe is way richer. And the way the immigration system is designed, rich people get in easier. That is how it should be. America isn't the world's refugee dump; if someone is coming in, I want them to add something to the nation. I think you are insinuating we discriminate by country of origin. We do not; Brazil is just for the most part poor, badly documented, and often criminal compared to Europe. So of course it's easier for a European to get in.