I think that:

1) Trump's knowlage of the system is highly overated, it's not because he says he know something, that he does. I made a list of trump's business failures in another post, the list is long, and he got saved by the state when he went broke in the 90s.

2) You can know the system, wanting it to change is another thing. You believe too foolish in a man that flip-floped in almost every issue in 20 years.

3) You may want to change the system, being able to do something is another thing as well. The president's chair is overated too, Obama wanted to change much more but he wasn't able to because of the congress. And this congress that didn't supported Obama, sure as hell won't support Trump.

^+1.

There's essentially no difference between Obama's message of Hope and Change and Trump's except that one of them sounds illiterate and one of them has a soul.

well it appears that the race is over, its gonna be Clinton vs Trump, and what's scary is that Trump may very well win the GE, since polls have shown that Bernie supporters would rather stay home than vote hillary...the world is doomed, i'm moving to Mars

I don't like either one of them. They're not the presidents we need, nor deserve.

Trump is probably the lesser of the two evils, because I doubt his crazy stuff will get through Congress. Plus Hillary is becoming more and more unlikable by the day.

^I say Bernie supporters head to Canada and Cruz supporters head to Russia, and we all let the USA crumble.

So two candidates supported by the Klan? How about we abandon the idea of voting for evil and actually vote in what we believe , you know , how it's supposed to work?

The establishment is just too scared that Cruz will end the corruption of the Republican Party

Nope. Cruz has his own donors and special interests that he just "forgets" to mention when railing against the Washington cartel. The only one self-funding is Donald Trump. The other one not taking money from donors and special interests would be Ben Carson, not Ted Cruz.

The best thing the GOP can hope for is an open convention. If the nomination is decided at the election then Trump doesn't get picked. If he wins the delegate count before that point then the Republicans have no choice. I really don't understand how people could possibly choose Trump over Hillary. While Hillary is no good news she's at least a tempered person, while Trump doesn't have the mind fit to be president. Trump sure as hell knows how to end corruption, but the question is could/would he stop it?
Note: I just heard from CBS that Trump wins big everywhere but Ohio, Kasich wins in the Buckeye State! Hillary takes both Florida and Ohio. Of the four remaining Republicans, I prefer Kasich. Of the Dems, I prefer Bernie. Ted and Trump are crazy, and Rubio is only okay. Masochistic isn't all that bad. Meanwhile Clinton is simply not trustworthy, simply put. Bernie, though naive, seems to be the best of the Dems. Of everyone, Kasich is best. But sadly that just won't happen.

Yeah that's why Cruz ran on ending ethanol subsidies in frickin Iowa where that's political suicide. Oh please. Trump is the epitome of the donor class. He's not going to end the cycle of political favors for political donations.

By the way...according to Politico, Cruz is only 1.5% down in Missouri with only 5.5% in and is only 3.8% down in N. Carolina with 33% in.

Edited 3/16/2016 01:28:18

Cruz is even worse than Trump, he just doesn't say controversial things so much.

Yeah that's why Cruz ran on ending ethanol subsidies in frickin Iowa where that's political suicide.

A stance that he then flip-flopped in, didn't he?

But regardless, he's taking big donations from big banks, just like Hillary.

Hmmmm, not over on the dem side yet either. Missouri and Illinois might go for Bernie, as rural areas more pro-Bernie, haven't been massivily counted yet compared to cities that are Clinton's strongholds.

Really funny though lol, how can the cities be more pro-Hillary? We'll never know...

Just quick update, MO is now being led by bernie. Ill might flip too.

A stance that he then flip-flopped in, didn't he?

Link me to what you're referring to.

But regardless, he's taking big donations from big banks, just like Hillary.

42% came from small donations. There's no way Ted could beat Trump's free media coverage without raising money, doesn't mean he's their puppet. His record confirms that.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00033085

Oh to someone who said no one is attacking Cruz - $7 million has been spent targeting Cruz.

Edited 3/16/2016 01:43:42

Cities are pro-Hillary because the cities have more minorities which are (mostly) putty in her hands for some reason.

Bernie, for whatever reason, does a lot better with white voters thus he takes rural counties easier.

Edited 3/16/2016 01:44:12

Link me to what you're referring to.

Not really interested in the whole topic, but here's something I found: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/ted-cruz-ethanol-217417

So you're saying that he's a flip-flopper for saying he wants the Ethanol Fuel Standard to be ended in 2022 instead of 2020? As long as he ends it, does it really matter the date? Trump wouldn't even say that.

Edited 3/16/2016 02:07:06

Trump voters and their solid arguments...

Maybe flip-flopping is too strong, it's something I heard on a topic that doesn't really interest me.

According to Politico, Cruz has cut the lead in Missouri to only .2% down from a high of 2.5%. They're separated by less than 2000 votes with only 50% in.