Rubio should have stayed in if only to keep Trump from automatically going to the primaries.

Jai i think you were thinking GOP nominations and Thom was thinking all nominations

Oh...wait but even then its still 5. Cruz, Kasich, Trump, Sanders, and Hillary.

At least Kasich can win his own state.

I did not know about Kasich until today, I apologise.

^toward Martian



Edited 3/16/2016 01:50:50

I did not know about Kasich until today, I apologise.

Haha no need to apologize dude. Its all good, just clarifying.

I live in a country where the only thing on the news about the US is violence at rallies. I genuinely know very little about what you guys do over there with your elections, although we generally just chuck our politicians out every three years anyways.

Shame. Rubio was my number one choice, seemed like a great candidate besides his flaws.

However, I'm smart enough to see a sinking ship. Rubio had no chance in Missouri, so I promptly went for Cruz in hope that Trump won't take my home state.

^Was this your first presidential election?

I have to wait till January. Might only have Trump on the ballot.

^Was this your first presidential election?

Yeah, was my first time voting. Don't know if my vote will have changed anything, but who knows, there's a chance MO could flip for Cruz.

Should have dropped out before today. What an idiot. Hope he never gets elected again. Probably gave Trump the GOP nomination.

Didn't you support Rubio after Rand Paul dropped out?

Also, Rubio didn't help Trump to the nomination. After Rubio drops out, many of his supporters will go to the Donald, just like many of poor Jeb!'s did.

Didn't you support Rubio after Rand Paul dropped out?

LOL. Of course not. After Rand I support Cruz.

He should dropped out on the last Super Tuesday (why are their 2?) but he seemed like an okay candidate.

From a liberal's perspective, Rubio was once the biggest threat to a Democrat winning the White House. But as soon as Christie nailed him for repeating himself four times in a row in a debate, things just went downhill for him. He once was the savior of the establishment, he was the only viable candidate left, but that all ended when he decided to go on full-out offense on Trump, resorting to attacks as personal as they get.

Nowadays I see Kasich as the most capable of beating Hillary or Bernie, even though he has almost no chance of winning the nomination.

Hmmm, yea this is almost won for the democrats in november. Will roughly depend on Bernie supporting Hillary if she wins the nomination.

lol. Hill is so weak a dead cow could beat her to the White House

Whether we like it or not, I believe that Trump is in a good position to win the election.(unfortunately)

Between Trump or Cruz the good question is who is worse??

Hillary's donors and special interests (Super PAC) have already started the mud slinging. It's quite entertaining even though pointless. But it's OK to call others Hitler if you are a good Democrat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPRI9AmyVvY

Trump, obviously. I really don't get the hate for Ted Cruz. Most of the people I've asked about it don't seem to have any other reason then, "He's a Christian so that must mean he's going to start a theocracy."

Cruz is a constitutionalist first and foremost, these portrayals of him as a religious fanatic are so off base.

As for Hillary Clinton, I don't get why people think she's a shoe-in. Republicans might be hated by far-leftists on the internet, but those same people make up far less of the general population. Clinton has a lot of baggage and will need to fight tooth and nail for the election even if Trump is her opponent.

If the Democrats wanted a candidate who could win easier they should have went with Sanders, but it might be too late for that now.

Edited 3/16/2016 17:42:18