Bosten probably wonders how many warn/supend he has..... no way he remembers. Also, right now the system is "invinsible" to normal players. Just letting them know it is a real thing has it's benefits.

Sounds about right. I'm honestly rather surprised it is only 6 reports. Mind you, I generally steer clear of vulgarity and personal attacks and have sparsely used the forums the last few years (why bother?) but even so, I figured I'd have more from annoyed opponents after they refused to surrender and I wouldn't kill them off. And whats the big idea airing my dirty laundry for all to see! (completely kidding, I could not care less)

Seems to me, in most cases you already know why you got the warning. I mean, if an offense was sufficient to merit a warning or further action then you already know what that action was. Or at least you should. It's not like people get warned/banned for trivial reasons.

Also, right now the system is "invinsible" to normal players. Just letting them know it is a real thing has it's benefits.

Agreed. It was interesting to read Pooh's comment regarding the process. I had no idea what it looked like (nor really any care) so it was interesting to see. Seems like something that should be kept on the wiki or somewhere on the site. Maybe a link on the 'report' page so people can understand what to expect. Also provide it as part of the warning/suspension advisory so they can know it wasn't just Fizzer or one person causing the action.

Also, this is what I mean that only Fizzer knows the process. He dosn't tell us what or how he wants the whole review system to work. For example their is no guidelines on when a mod should send a wl mail. We are simply given the option. (Nor do we have a secret forum or anything to coordinate/ask/discuss)