If the US was not born the way it was, I would not hesitate to be for the banning of guns that can do more than be a hunting tool. Alas, that is not the case.

Stricter background checks would be nice. Passing on guns to your child, or whoever, should also be done through the system, I think. There are way too many guns in the US now for me to see banning much of what legal firearms exist from the public as logical. We can say that if the AR-15 and similar weapons were banned, then the Orlando shooter would not have killed so many, or might not have attempted to kill, at all. On the other hand, we can just as easily say that if everyone in that bar, those fifty-some law abiding citizens, all had guns of their own, the Orlando shooter would not have killed many at all, and would reconsider even trying.

Edited 6/23/2016 04:15:53

rpgs r gud, butt i dra da line at N U K E Z

+1 Buffloe

banning of guns that can do more than be a hunting tool.

why stop there? Just ban all guns other than historic ones that are put in a muse. Any gun can be modified to be stronger, see the Adler lever-deed shotgun in Australia.

Cars don't hurt the environment. People who drive cars hurt the environment.

Not sure why we have all these stupid regulations.

why stop there? Just ban all guns other than historic ones that are put in a muse. Any gun can be modified to be stronger, see the Adler lever-deed shotgun in Australia.

For farmers, whose livestock and poultry are terrorized by coyotes and foxes, sometimes mountain lions.

For hunters, who keep animal populations in check and use the animals to feed families, saving a small, but satisfactory amount of money.

farmers, whose livestock and poultry are terrorized by coyotes and foxes, sometimes mountain lions.

I don't think farmers regularly take potshots at coyotes or something, especially big corporate farms, and that's really cruel to the coyotes and foxes, who are just trying to live.

For hunters, who keep animal populations in check

or extinguish them - and what does it mean, "in check"?

use the animals to feed families

uh no, that doesn't happen, in America, anyway. Maybe just for novelty of it, but it's 100% for fun. Furthermore, that's also extremely disrespectful to eat those who you have killed - as if it wasn't cruel enough to kill them, even if it was somehow needed.

How is it disrespectful? It would be wasteful not to.

my rights > your dead kids

How is it disrespectful? It would be wasteful not to.

Most folk find that disrespectful - do you want your body cooked and then eaten up after you're dead? I don't think your family would want that at all.

Well if a beast killed me, I would want to be eaten by the beast. Come on, I want to benefit animals, not some dirty good for nothing fungi.

X you're delusional. Animals aren't the same as humans.

Guns should need a background check to purchase. There should also be a age limit, pluas when hunting(like a fishing license). There weapons. They should be hard to get. Maybe airport security could be better too, so attacks like EgyptAir and MalaysiaAirlines wouldnt happen. Its a bit of everything. But mostly for people not to be stupid with them. Which is what happens.

^ This. +1 DerWyyy. Most Americans all seem to favor basic gun regulations like this... which, for the most part, wouldn't result in confiscation of any guns from law-abiding citizens. However Congress still isn't doing jack shit. Dems are protesting, but that's all they can do. It all comes down to the Republican side of Congress to realize that the vast majority of Americans, including conservatives, are against them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51clP7JRqv8

You can't take my bombs if I have used them already