in China there are no competitors. The gvmnt is a 1 party system. 1 party can speak for a whole nation. In America it isn't like this. Really Smed?

Edited 7/25/2016 19:24:23

In America the Democrats control the government. If you can't understand that the party in control of the government is effectively the government, then you shouldn't be involved in politics.

Belgian Gentleman going full retard again.

I see I made you salty +1

I see you're a retard who doesn't understand politics and thinks that the party in control of the government cooperating with a business isn't the government cooperating with that business.

High ranked democratic party leaders do strictly not represent the gouverment. Only yet when they are put in that position which is limited to only appointed party members in political carreer. Since Chinese laws differ hugely from American laws these countries can't be compared to each other in terms of gouverment speaking. Even the dnc delegation in this case did not represent the gouverment. More information about China is that (I need to reasearch this later) but the main party leaders appearently can also speak for a whole country.

yet not all democrats represent the gouverment and yet not all democrats represent the democrats. I was telling you that you used a fallacy. The only gouverment related to democrats are the ones that were being appointed thus the ones that represent the gouverment. The dnc delegation didn't speak for the gouverment but they did for their party and yet you try to imply the dnc delegation has responsiblity over the gouverment but they don't.

And if you want to continue to live up your claim that democrats (the question quickly rises: which ones?, I claim it's the appointed ones, still waiting what you try to imply here) show responsbility of the gouverment's actions then you also'll have to accept that there also republican appointed gouverment officials and various more party officials. The thing is that it doesn't simply limit to the leading party because this gouverment can vary from local,state,county,congress and senate level. Not only the official level.

The Democratic Party has dozens of agents in the government, controls most of it and controls most of it's power. If you removed the democratic politicians from the system at once, it would collapse. The Democratic Party is therefore intertwined with the government.

The "gouverment" is a broad-term not only a term to refer to the secretaries of state and their president. If you still want to believe your own claim then I redirect you to wikipedia and search for "federal goverment of the united states". Democrats do not control it and that's a ridicilous thing to say since gouverment is controlled by many,many appointed officials each belonging to a different party or independent.

I'm still very curious what your definition of "gouverment" is and explain it to me.

if Democrats would be removed from the sysytem new appointed officials from other parties would take their positions. Easy , no?

Edited 7/25/2016 19:58:30

Democratic party and gouverment or 'goverment' do not equal each other.

Edited 7/25/2016 19:59:13

I live in Turkey and i get 50 Clinton Ads a day and all Trump Ads i have ever seen in my lifetime is 40.

Another day living in corporate Turkey

^ Erdoganist*

For once I agree with Smedley