and said consequences were completely wiped when he whined enough :)

Not really, insane bane. He isn't allowed to use alts and he was banned for a while.

No alts: A consequence
Banning: A consequence

Fizzers rule is arbitrary, similar to a tyrant, but he's still the one who hands out punishments. Not fop dandies like ps.

Edited 9/25/2016 02:29:05

''No alts: A consequence''

nope

"Banning: A consequence''

1 day isn't a consequence

Definition of consequence:

a result or effect of an action or condition.

Shred spammed and was caught, as a result he cannot use alts and was banned for a day.

The only real punishment is us having to read that "apology"


Also, what was his excuse for spamming again? To test the mods? Who the hell does he think he is?

yes he can

It was dictated to him that he could not and he is following it. That is a result of his actions and hence a consequence.

''was banned for a day.''

big whoop

It matters not the severity of the consequence, just if it is a consequence or not, and since it is a result of his actions, it is.

Also, what was his excuse for spamming again? To test the mods? Who the hell does he think he is?

I think it was him just trolling.

Edited 9/25/2016 02:50:43

who is frankly shielding Shredtail2 at this point? He did something terrible that if he just used his brain a bit more or was more careful, wouldn't be punished for it. A day should be fine for most Warlight players, though - no need to harm others in FFAs and teamgames.

nope he can get around it

Do you even understand the meaning of the word consequence?

who is frankly shielding Shredtail2 at this point? He did something terrible that if he just used his brain a bit more or was more careful, wouldn't be punished for it. A day should be fine for most Warlight players, though - no need to harm others in FFAs and teamgames.

I'm not saying that he shouldn't have been punished; I'm saying that fop folk like ps aren't helping or doing good by saying spammer on his threads.

I think it was him just trolling.


ahh so his apology *was* a troll

Yeah, and you definitely weren't egging him on, were you, Juq? Personally, I think Shred missed his true calling. His trolling ability is amazing. I'm not saying he didn't do anything wrong. I'm just saying that there's no point in attacking him for it now when you don't attack Fissel (okay, you do, but ps, wct, Bane, etc don't) or Karl.

I think it was him just trolling.


ahh so his apology *was* a troll

No I'm saying that he was probably just trolling. Funny how two spammer trolls thinks they have an moral obligation to shame others for it.

I'm saying that fop folk like ps aren't helping or doing good by saying spammer

is that their point? hardly anything "good" gets done on the forum.

you definitely weren't egging him on, were you, Juq?

Oh, I was, and I loved it. Call me a sadist of kinds.

you don't attack Fissel

to be fair, Fissel doesn't really do like a human does. When someone did call him a troll, he said "I refute your statement. I'm not a troll.". While shredtail, uh, he's much more human.

Edited 9/25/2016 03:05:04

So you're saying that you attack Shred because the reactions are better?

Shred can understand what we're saying and perhaps believe or agree with it. Less so with goblins.

who's attacking shred at all anyway? Attacking =/ criticising

Edited 9/25/2016 03:17:17

aliens

I'd expect that from BUFFALO, but not you

wct, you have shot yourself in the foot quite nicely. You do realize that Shred has already had consequences, right?

Have you read any of the links I posted? Particularly on the Prisoner's Dilemma?

It matters not the severity of the consequence, just if it is a consequence or not, and since it is a result of his actions, it is.

This is incorrect. The diagram is just a visual aid, it doesn't contain all the details.

In fact, the relative payoffs (positive or negative) of the various interactions is an important part of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Indeed, they are what make it a dilemma in the first place: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma

For a simple short intro (again, you should probably read the article for a fuller understanding):

Prisoner's Dilemma: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Lo2fgxWHw
The Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma and The Evolution of Cooperation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOvAbjfJ0x0

Edited 9/25/2016 03:49:55

This is incorrect. The diagram is just a visual aid, it doesn't contain all the details.

It isn't incorrect, Karl's arguing it's not a consequence when by definition it is.

I am the most morally just person on this website. Fact.

It isn't incorrect, Karl's arguing it's not a consequence when by definition it is.

Ah. Well, in any case, for the purposes of what I was talking about, the severity of the consequence is a critical factor.