I agree that he made some achievements, even great ones such as highways and Volkswagen. However some of his policies remained unreasonable which is why he lost the war.
I won't say that the term "Zionist media" is accurate though. Zionism is not the reason why "Zionist media" opposes Hitler.
If I were a German nationalist leader I would co-opt Jews as done in WWI instead. The Soviets could be defeated. However making it a part of Germany was too ambitious to succeed at that time. A much better approach was to support a weak puppet Russian anti-Communist government and cause enough chaos that Russia can not threaten Germany from the East for some time. As for Britain it is almost impossible to fully defeat without a sufficiently advanced navy so it needed to be appeased, not attacked. War with the States was completely wrong.
Elliot - please don't forget to go live on YouTube when you start your autistic shooting spree. I don't even disagree with your right to remove yourself from the gene pool, and I certainly don't want to silence you when you do it. I'm sure people will have a good laugh.
^Doesn't matter. Yes Germany was good in a 1 on 1 battle. However the sheer size of the Soviet Union should have caused Germany to make its occupation policies more lenient for the purpose of getting Russians to oppose the Soviets.
>implying Slavs are white >Implying anyone is white besides Brandenburgers >Bavarians have Negro blood >Westphalians have Celtic blood >Holsteiners have inferior Nordic cuck blood >Prussians have degenerate Baltic blod
Posts 1 - 13 of 13
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.