Stop saying "Hitlery was democratically elected." She only received 48% of the vote. More people voted against Hillary than for her. The only honest way is to hold a runoff which Trump would have won.

She may have lost the majority, but she won the plurality

And Justinian, I doubt the Russians did that, but more people voted Clinton than Trump

The only honest way is to hold a runoff which Trump would have won.

the internet, where everyone is a psychic.

The US was never supposed to be a democracy with directly elected representatives. The founding fathers despised democracy.

^ It was definitely supposed to be a republic.

Pretty sure the Founding Fathers didn't want despots.

In a pure democracy 51% of the people would vote to strip 49% of their voting rights. And then those 51% of the remaining voters would vote to strip 49% of the remaining voters of their voting rights, ect. until you only have two voters left, a King and a Queen.

The founders were in favor of a rights based, Locke based, government.

I think you forgot that people actually have morals

^What do you mean?

Pretty sure the Founding Fathers didn't want despots.

The "Founding Fathers" enabled 3% of the population to vote in the 1700s, they wanted an aristocratic szlata.

could seriously be the next hitler

Are you just trying to show everybody how stupid you are, or did the sarcasm not come through?

I just realised





I'm alt-right
Wally wants to marry DJ Trump
Karl is a liberal
Taggy isn't a troll and is very collectivist and hypersexual

We're all sarcastic

Can we not just be reasonable? Arguing is never really going solve anything.

The problem with expecting a reasonable discussion is that there are just some idiots out there that don't even know how stupid they are.

They go around spouting nonsense, thinking because they can string some large words together, that they are intelligent.

They actually lack any ability to form a single critical thought, and still think they win arguments because other people can't understand wtf they are saying.

In a pure democracy 51% of the people would vote to strip 49% of their voting rights. And then those 51% of the remaining voters would vote to strip 49% of the remaining voters of their voting rights, ect. until you only have two voters left, a King and a Queen.

The founders were in favor of a rights based, Locke based, government.

I suggest studying more into monarchy. Monarchy is not the equivalent of authoritarian rule; it may take the form of an authoritarian dictatorship but Republics resulting in dictatorships have historically taken the form of military or ideological rule, rather than rule based on a traditional class system.

Human nature ensures democracy results in in tyranny; if the consent of the masses is required then the masses will fall into an ideological mold and minority [opinions] will be discarded as politically inconvenient.

Jefferson read Locke but he also feared the rise of the proletarian and preferred an educated voting class; Hamilton and the Federalists were in favor of aristocracy.

I wouldn't mind marrying Ivanka.

^What do you like about her?

Edited 4/30/2017 19:58:52

What do you like about her?

She's gorgeous, rich, and appears to be pretty intelligent. She's also the daughter of the President of the United States, who is corrupt as fuck and loves using his power to make his family and friends money.

^^ haha