Do not think there methods ... if time you learn how to respond to it is not something that can be learned

Lesson 5: Surprise your enemy with your picks.

Step 1. Make the picks outside of your usual cage.
Step 2. Make more picks than usual. Sometimes it is okay to make six picks. The information he can get is balanced with the superior force you have in one area.
Step 3. Build a stack.
Step 4. Go hunt him down where you are not.
Step 5. Win.

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6720544

namib, you should join ladder asap!

Lesson 6: Do what your opponent asks you to do.

Step 1. Listen to your opponent.
Step 2. Do what he says.
Step 3. Win.

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6721035

oh shut it you. at that point it was psychological warfare. i didn't think you'd actually do it.

plus you ONLY won because you got lucky off the pick you did NOT get. i think you'd agree with that.

Namid is dead Skull , dont worry about it anymore.

Lessons are over.

ugh. stupid pulsey.

Namib we are not smart like you. we can't understand your smart tactics. you are wasting your time with telling us how to play.

now namib is dead. time to understand him.

R.I.P.

When I was reading I was not sure if the advice was sarcasm or the truth, because an abnormal amount of comments were the rare comments called 'compliments.' Still unsure...

Almost definitely sarcasm.

:(

i really liked this namib dude.
And the real fun was just about to begin..

Pulsey, you asshole...

A lot was not sarcasm.

The play in most of the games was very good, it was only the picks that were sort of, questionable, even then, they weren't typically bad, just unorthodox. The only "bad" thing was the intentional non-existence of picks 4, 5, 6.

Pulsey you dick :(

I'm so sorry guys! I feel really bad now... :'( Will you please forgive me? Pretty please?

no

Each forum begins Lhtmalot pages on the same player

'huge stack' is not the way to victory, IMO.

you get a better return on the minimal amount of attackers necessary for positive probability of victory.

That first unit that takes your odds over 50% is the most well-spent unit. Every unit after that has diminishing returns.

"you get a better return on the minimal amount of attackers necessary for positive probability of victory.

That first unit that takes your odds over 50% is the most well-spent unit. Every unit after that has diminishing returns."

This is nonsense.

With your logic 16v10 is better than 17v10 because 16v10 has 59% chance of success and 17v10 has 95% chance.

So, they're defending West China, and you think deploying 1 extra army to have your chance to break WC increase by 36% is a bad investment.

.36 * .6 = 2.16

Far more than the 1 army you deployed.

Edited 8/3/2014 03:42:50