Ohh ok, that's fair enough.

how about the greece template that is used on the realtime ladder then?
please setup up the first game :) wouldn't mind having my own clan, it's hip, and always an endless source of drama ^_^

Strat 1v1? Sure I'll try for a laugh.

i play first player i win

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6799257

If you are really that good then you should make it win against you 3 times in a row....if you think about it if someone beats you 3 times it shows that the person is already better than you..so 5 times is just too much and with the luck involves even supreme players will lose. But nonetheless i like your idea and do you mind posting the challenge games that you get?

I'll play. Stray 1v1. No chance obviously but something to play for.

2th player i win. win 1 lose 1

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6799288
http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6799634

The real question is whether you are good enough to beat them all 5 times straight. That is clearly not the case for Panda and I doubt it would even be true for Arun.

But hey, it's always easy to prove your supremacy by stacking the deck in your favor. I mean, obviously you are the superior player if you can accomplish something that is statistically 97% likely...

you say without logic. when it is so easy not lose why you not do this?

players can not lose. only i can lose. so you say not logical things. i play many player i can beat more then 5 times in a row.

I would like to try. I know I won't win, but I'd like to play against a good player.

I would like to try. I know I won't win, but I'd like to play against a good player.

Win, if you played another player with the same skill level as you then you would only have a 3% (1 in 32) chance of losing 5 consecutive games.

In other words, your challenge is complete crap and constructed to favor you to the extreme.

A truly excellent player would base the wager on the opponent's ability to beat them ONCE in FIVE tries, not FIVE in FIVE.

ahaha i never say i am best player. i say i am good player. so where arr you truly excellent player make this challenge?
no one make this challenge i only make this challenge. and you come here say this things and to insult me.

also, you logic say that this truly excellent player can come and beat me. because is truly excellent can beat me FIVE in FIVE. but here they not even have risk only i have risk. so why you insult me angryman?

I can't even make enough sense of that to reply. Just gibberish.

for you i make this challenge win 3 times in row. you think you can do this? what have you calculate is chance for you ?

also you say i have 1 in 32 chance to lose. so i say now I play 32 players. you say then i lose. how is challenge crap?

and sorry for bad english.

Why would I take on a challenge where I could win 2 of 3 games and still lose? That makes no sense.

Your challenge is not an actual challenge but one heavily weighted in your favor. A true challenge would be guaranteeing that you could win 5 straight against any opponent, or at least 4 of 5. Then I would give you some credit.

Richard, I think you've misinterpreted his challenge. I don't think he's doing it to prove that he's better - or even a good player. I think it's more like marc's tower challenge a few months ago.

I think he's providing a tool for challenging yourself, much like the single player levels or a 2v1 game. Although, since (even if you're better) the losses may only be luck, it's not a very good challenge.

Richard, what the hell? Why does it matter if it's in his favour? He just says, "if any of you can beat me 5 times in a row I'll buy you a clan."

He is the only one with anything to lose i.e. the cost of a clan. The challenge is for, get this, the challenger. It's supposed to be difficult to win the clan.