Bleh

When I get a sec, I'll create a game with all of the remaining players, just letting them know the game stage. I know several people mentioned they were struggling to keep up, so with fewer players the game should go slower.

Edit - I'm not setting deadlines as I'm not 100% sure when I'll next be online. 48hours ish though.

Edited 9/2/2014 14:41:11

Those several people are idiots. Is it really that hard? It takes me (as an outsider now) around a minute to click through pages and see what's going on.

That sounds good Dom, thanks.

People that take your tactics Arun...would die straight away, like you.

Apollo ... you think it's better to sign up to a game where the premise is you talk and discuss - that being the nature of the game with the intention only of seeing how long you can not take part and survive just a few turns longer and still eventually die, and still have your team die?

It's a serious question I'm not understanding how some people are playing this game - I think if there was something like what Silver does where if you don't post or vote for a few turns you are killed off, the game would be much more fun and interesting for everyone.

Edited 9/2/2014 16:34:29

Tactics? You mean actually play the game? If everyone played the game why would you die early?

Imagine if you played it that way in real life ... how would that appear to your friends playing the game with you?

Edit - not necessarily you as you are now taking part - but there's a lot of folks either not playing or thinking if I don't talk I won't die for a few more rounds and ... do they think that's a 'win'?

Edited 9/2/2014 16:37:38

Sitting in the corner doing nothing. "Yes I'm playing the smart way don't worry!"

Apollo is hardly taking part, admits to being unwilling to and complains when I tell people to play, instead suggesting the correct approach is to be silent.

Edited 9/2/2014 16:39:11

Inactive players must be eliminated

Yes. Kill them all.

Thirded. They contribute nothing. Even if it kills more villagers than wolves. It brings interest back to the game. Kill them.

Edited ... fourthed, Fifthed? Are they even words lol

Edited 9/2/2014 17:16:39

I'm very worried about how imbalanced the game would become by killing inactives, but I agree, for future games, I will have to include some form of ruling to encourage participation.


I've just created a game with everyone as a reminder. The only person I couldn't do it with was Blue - searching on a phone is hugely frustrating, so could someone pretty please create a game with him + me (Dom365 account)

Policy eule for Wolves #3

1.Players not chatting for 2 days must be eliminated
1b. Inacives that give a reason what were thay insctive will have a limit of more that 48h
1c.if inactives give reason after 48h their reason will be not validated

It was a joke...you guys are too serious.

I think something like 2 missed votes in a row equals death, or something like that? We'll decide it at the end of this game :)

Erm thats unfair to actives that dont want to vote

Yeah ^^ It's not only missed votes though, voting every round but not commenting - that's the same problem :(

We can iron it out after the current game.

Voting without commentary is a step up from where we are now, at least!

Besides, it does give a fair bit of information, at least!