^ So what? anything bad about that?
Better live in successful Socialist/Social-democratic Nations such as some Scandinavian countries (Sweden best example) where everyone get a chance in life, than the Capitalist dictatorial regimes were social castes are still lingering, like in the UK.
Nowadays a social apartheid exists in many countries the worse developped country in that field is the UK, you should not be proud of that:
The report shows that the poorest 40 per cent of Britons share a lower proportion of the national wealth - 14.6 per cent - than in any other Western country. This is only marginally better than in Russia, the only industrialised nation, east or west, to have a worse record.
The gap in Britain and Australia is exactly the same as in Nigeria, much worse than in Jamaica, Ghana or the Ivory Coast and twice as bad as in Sri Lanka or Ethiopia.
Comparison with earlier Human Development Reports shows that inequality is growing fast in Britain. The 1991 report ranks Britain around the middle of industrialised countries both for the share of national income that went to the poorest two fifths of the population (17.3 per cent) and for the gap between the richest and the poorest fifth (6.8 times).
Mr Bruno's paper identifies Britain as one of only a handful of countries where inequality is increasingly rapidly. The Human Development Report also highlighted the world's billionaires - observing that the 358 people with assets of more than $1bn were worth more than the combined annual income of 45 per cent of the world's people.
from the Independent
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk-most-unequal-country-in-the-west-1329614.html