Civ 5: No major complaints, though not spawning near Iron or Coal always bothers me Skyrim: Relative pointlessness of one handed weapons once you realize there's no value in holding two at once. Though this can be solved, I still don't like it. Incessant wolf attacks. Titanfall: An overspam of Burn Cards Halo: Offline non-campaign play sucks.
Each to his own. Haven't tried it, because it fails the will I buy it test:
1. Is it made by EA? ---FAILED--- 2. Is it for kids? ---PASSED--- 3. Does it look awesome? ---PASSED--- 4. Does my solitary friend on Xbox one have it? ---FAILED---
For me to look at a game, it must pass three of these tests, and can't fail the first one.
CoD:After World at War, the game turned into garbage, the only real saving grace was Black Ops and zombies. But even then some of the fun maps like Moon you have to pay for. Campaigns are the same, you don't have to aim to kill things, no tactics nothing. Same with every mission
Battlefield: Each campaign is way too short with a majorly anticlimatic ending. Physics in the game are amazing, along with the vehicles but, you're forced to drive instead of being able to switch to the primary gunner position (depending on the vehicle). Multiplayer is amazing if your playing with 4 other friends and able to talk with each other. (ALLAH AKBAR!!!!!! NO DES DON'T DO IT. YES, YES I WILL CHARGE THIS TANK WITH NOTHING BUT MY REPAIR TOOL). If you're playing along its pretty much boring, not fun and full of rage. Plain and simple. Oh yeah, and physics. Can't forget the overly realistic bullet drop at two feet away with the UMP45
Halo: Amazing campaigns, shitty multiplayer, great maps. But, Halo Wars 2 is being made by CA and 343, so it'll be nice.
Elderscrolls:Boring after 5k hours put into it. (Yes I do have a life...I think) Dungeons are too repeatable. You don't get a real option to choose about what you want to say. And everything is the same on each run through. DLC's added a little but not enough to continue really playing.
Witcher:Dear god, the 3rd game is amazing. But again, limited dialogue choices and very much assassins creed combat style. Campaign is very, very solid. And on the hardest difficulty (Death March) it truly is hard. Seriously and truly hard. (I'm still trying to get that damn achievement, and if anyone does gods pound you.)
Assassins Creed:Too repeatable, the last two games have been trash. Recent marioish one also very much sucked. Oh well.
NBA:MyCarrer is the only thing worth playing, but once you become a starter its pretty much boring. Myteam and other such gamemodes suck. Really...really suck.
Madden:Terrible game mechanics but it gets progressively better each year. Madden Ultimate Team is the only gamemode worth playing. The be a career mode is terrible, and they didn't invest much time into it. Its quite sad.
Fifa: Fifa Ultimate Team: Over the top through balls are still OP, too much shit that doesn't happen in real life happens. (Bale gets the ball at kick off, walks two steps forward towards your goal kicks it and it goes in. Doesn't matter who your goalie is) Price Ranges saved the game even though many people said it ruined it. It made it so people aren't spending 10million plus coins on someone "good". My Career:If you don't set it for first summer transfer, no matter what team you want to play for you'll go else where. Especially if you're rated over the original player. Other than that, game mechanics are pretty good.
So many other games I could've listed but. I don't want you guys bitching about it too much.
Lel. Try GT for something that everyone both has something great in, and something to whack it with. Or you can do that with iPhones, Windows, or just about anything that has existed for a long time. Those arguments are the most interesting, because at the end everyone agrees that all things are awesome.
I am annoyed by no Napoleonic Wars Assassin's Creed games. Come on that was more exciting then probably all of the previous assassin's creed game locations.
Really? The Crusades, post-1453 Istanbul, Renaissance Italy? That does not pique your interest more than Napoleonic Wars? They'd probably screw it up anyway! I can already see the inaccuracy in depicting Napoleon, or the messing up of battles like Austerlitz. No! I don't want to think he won Austerlitz because of some pervert running around in white cloth was trying to kill Crusaders!
Also when games that are supposed to be the "great American goodguys fighting evil terrorists"(spunkgarggleweewee(hope you got that reference)) that have you play as a foot soldier of a high tech empire fighting a country armed with 60 year old weapons and 45 year old trucks(the trucks constituting what is close as it gets to armour for the opposition). At least in the paranoid Russian invasion games have enemies that present danger.
Unity was fun enough, and it already goes dangerously close to the Napoleonic wars, especially the Dead Kings DLC. Also, I suspect its shelf life has been massively extended, as Syndicate has no form of multiplayer at all. Apart from the Abstergo stuff, one thing that they need to be careful of is going much more modern than about 1870. Beyond that point, guns become very useful, especially Gatling guns.
CoD : You played one level... you've played every game in the entire series. assassins creed : boooooring. Skyrim : gets repetitive after 2k hours... impressive. But with mods, it never get boring. Madden, FIFA, NBA : all suck. Civ 5 : AI's suck Dishonored: Really? A video game where your PUNISHED for killing people?
I have a gripe with games that try to control what I try to do. I'm looking at you Cod and Gears of war! Those game put a invisible wall on almost everything!
You know I really hate *rubber banding in racers. *Jumpscares in the elder scrolls,am I the only one to have this. *Dead eye enemy accuracy in fps games,cod 2 I'm looking at you. *crap cameras that act as if on crack. *games trying to be "interactive movies" you're ethier a game or a movie pic one.
