are you plannign to do some changes to the ai?

if not, would you consider creating a few diferente ai settings:
1)defensive ai: privileges the defense of bonuses, spreading somewhat evenly the armies across the borders
2) peacefull ai: does not enter in war with another oponente until she attacks her
3) etc.

I believe you should try to target a wider public, so far the site is mostly designed for strategy players, while most of the players are quite interested about history, you should try to get in touch with some of the map designers to recreate wars in maps (most already exist, but you should try to use that explicitly), you should then add those maps to the single player stuff

On what Pink said, is there no way for a player to suggest to the AI to take a terr to achieve a bonus, or in the case of card games suggest the AI use a card

what i said would imply that the ai would have been set like that from the beggining and i was actually thinking mostly about using that for single player settings

18 mins before the stream starts.. First!

I've been on since 8 AM accidentally :|
Forgot Fizzer lived in the same time zone as I do, so I thought the streamed happened at 11 AM EST instead.

He's late...wonder what happened.
EDIT: He just went online.

Edited 8/12/2015 18:04:25

Sorry if this has been answered already, I'm a little late to the party.

Dear Fizzer,

How hard would it be to implement highlighting a territory or bonus that you are currently in for the AI to take. They actually do a decent job, but for super bonuses they won't take an already filled bonus.

Didn't have an account to comment. With all the discussion on points, I'm wondering if it would be feasible to turn off points. I'm at a high enough level that leveling up will limit future name changes. I'd like to stop leveling up because there is no advantage to gaining levels at this point.

@Jz but that would kind of be a waste a resources to limit something, wouldn't it?

Hey Fizzer, I am a transfer from Kongregate, as it is becoming so quiet on that site now. Are you thinking of developing Warlight on that site? How about making the Kongregate and Warlight.net servers the same to help with population? That would help bring more people across :)

Edited 8/12/2015 20:29:48

edit: ignore this

Edited 8/12/2015 20:50:45

Jz you can just enable adblocker to reduce your points to a min. Yyou won't get many points with adblocker on

I'm the author of Edgeless Square, and am currently working on Edgeless Square 2.0, along with 4 or 5 other map projects. When 2.0 is complete, would it be possible to have 1.0 deleted, it has 3 minor flaws, that 2.0 will resolve.

Is it possible to have an automated automatic deployment option? On a map that is particularly large, with a huge number of bonuses (mine has 324 for example), a long term game becomes tedious having to search out where every bonus is, and clicking the deployment into each bonus becomes something of a trial. Would there be a way to automate this process?

Fizzer, you just said "It didn't do well on Kongregate" but it was on the Kongregate front page for weeks, it became less popular over time because you never developed it. I rarely ever see you there either. You could pull so many people from there if you made it like this site.

More people come from there than you maybe realise...

I also like the idea of a "limited" multi-attack option, a triple attack option like you described would be nice and interesting.

when are you going to re-evaluate the ui/ux of the site?

edit: more specifically- when will you decide to freeze new features for a minute to tighten up what is already here? it's getting a little all over the place imo

Edited 8/13/2015 02:09:03

gotta say that when you game gets achievements on Kong, it has done rather well.

has he given any interesting new insights this time?

Did Fizzer post his question session on Youtube? If so, is there a link?

not yet. but he will probably post on the WL channel