Well two of them are inactive and two of them left due to...

*dromroll please*...

CORP Drama!! :)

@HAWKS guy: 1v1 me brah so I can shut you up

Link: https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=9658004

Edited 10/16/2015 20:56:07

I fail at 2v2ing

General Chou are underrated
Mhunters probably overrated

Uh... what a surprise... despite the bootings the Master Hunters do better than a clan centered around their members having a profile picture of their pet. Come on... I mean... seriously?

He stated that because General Chou were commonly getting voted last, and M'Hunters were commonly getting voted 2nd.

you must be kidding

Heyyy, Knyte joined Darklords!

My PR campaign must have worked!

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=9630949

Edit : ignore this

Edited 10/17/2015 08:25:38

1st Week Summary:


All completed games have been 1v1 so overall games reflects 1v1 games won-lost. Now some thoughts:

M'Hunters has a good lead with Lu Fredd and CORP not far behind in points. M'Hunter, Dutch Forever and Lu Fredd need be concerned with their win-loss ratio as they risk hitting their ceilings faster then other clans.

General Chou is on the board! I'm glad we now have all clans winning points :). While bringing up the rear, only 29 games have finished so far, 12% of total games. No clan is out of the running yet!

Hawks is steady with a respectable (3-3) score

Illuminati is the slowest clan so far, only 5 games completed so they hold the highest ceiling. CORP and Illuminati have the majority of their wins coming from one player, mm3100 and Nyetworker respectively, and it is yet to be seen how the rest of their clans will fair.

I will end on how competitive this division is. No team is dominating with most teams have a roughly even win-loss ratio. I think this division is the one to watch right to the end!

1. M'Hunters (7-5)
2. CORP (5-2)
3. Lu Fredd (5-6)
4. Illuminati (4-1)
5. Dutch Forever (4-7)
6. Hawks (3-3)
7. General Chou's (1-5)

And now we are back to the partisan spin of the clans!

Edited 10/17/2015 19:25:53

You got that right and thanks Great Expanse for the clear commentatory and scoreboard
Much appreciated
Also join in folks view thee matches cause this tournament is something you guys should not miss

(Rooting for CORP go forth it boys)

Edited 10/17/2015 19:15:52

M'Hunters maybe in the leade, but they already played 12 games, while others have played less.

Wait until Nagromo and Ko play their games, General Chou's will catch up. Also, AXO is responsible for 3 of our losses, poor guy.

Edited 10/17/2015 20:40:07

I fear that CORP will perform excellently in 1v1 and 2v2, but our 3v3 teams lack the beef that say, M'Hunters and Lu Fredd have. (Despite the fact that in one of M'Hunters teams they have RBK :( )

Thanks for this update, glad to see how things are going so far! I think it'll be a 2 way race between Illuminati and CORP for a lot of it, because those boots from RBK will really take their toll on the M'Hunters, and Lu Fredd seem to be making some careless mistakes, finishing their matches too quickly. Hawks are doing better than I expected, but not strong enough to get promoted, I think. General Chou will definitely start competing when their two best players finish their matches, but I don't think that's enough for them to propel them into the front of the race. Dutch have a respectable amount of wins, but the losses outweigh them badly, and that'll definitely set them back in the later stages of this.

Edited 10/17/2015 23:26:55

Wait until Nagromo and Ko play their games, General Chou's will catch up.

I find it kinda amusing how people assume Ko being a superb player. This is because of what exactly?

Is it because of this?
3 player FFA: 5 / 6 (83%)
4 player FFA: 60 / 69 (87%)
5 player FFA: 6 / 9 (67%)
6 player FFA: 8 / 8 (100%)
7 player FFA: 5 / 6 (83%)
8 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
10 player FFA: 6 / 6 (100%)
12 player FFA: 6 / 7 (86%)
13 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
14 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
15 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
17 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
24 player FFA: 2 / 2 (100%)
35 player FFA: 2 / 2 (100%)
50 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)

Or because he cheated (stalled) his way to the top of the 1v1 and the 2v2 ladder?

KO is good. he may be very slow or had even cheated (i don't know about his ladder runs), but he's a good player

I find it kinda amusing how people assume Ko being a superb player. This is because of what exactly?

Is it because of this?
3 player FFA: 5 / 6 (83%)
4 player FFA: 60 / 69 (87%)
5 player FFA: 6 / 9 (67%)
6 player FFA: 8 / 8 (100%)
7 player FFA: 5 / 6 (83%)
8 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
10 player FFA: 6 / 6 (100%)
12 player FFA: 6 / 7 (86%)
13 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
14 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
15 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
17 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)
24 player FFA: 2 / 2 (100%)
35 player FFA: 2 / 2 (100%)
50 player FFA: 1 / 1 (100%)

No we see him as a good player because of this:
1v1: 740 / 950 (78%)
2v2: 194 / 241 (80%)
3v3: 85 / 99 (86%)

These are what matter in clan league

I agree with what Ox says. I only will add that I think the difference between the top ranked clan and bottom will possibly be the closest out of all the divisions. So while some clans have been ranked as lower it is the margins. Everyone will be competitive.

As well I am starting daily tracking of points so I will eventually post a timeline of how clans get their post. Which clans are slowly growing, which clans are stagnating.

No we see him as a good player because of this:
1v1: 740 / 950 (78%)
2v2: 194 / 241 (80%)
3v3: 85 / 99 (86%)

For me this means that he shows little interest in finding worthwile opponents while his ffa stats are obviously just plain nonsense.

Do you have to come first to get promoted or can you come 2nd as well?

So Ko was the one who won the only 50 player FFA ever played...