In most northern European languages Belarus is called something what literary means "White-Russia" for example in Dutch it's called Wit-Rusland

In German too: "Weißrussland" directly translated into English: "White Russia".

Isn't Russia pretty white already?

It's practically covered in snow

Only during winter, of course the high north is an exception.

I meant Siberia/northern parts

In German too: "Weißrussland" directly translated into English: "White Russia".

Polish "Białoruś" (guess where the english name come from :p) means the same.

Isn't Russia pretty white already?

There were "Red Russia" and "Black Russia" too (todays Ukraine). ^^

They try too hard to pretend to be Wielpolskans :)

There are two Brests in Europe.

There are more - as for important boroughs, Brest in Croatia was important, as well.

I think that map's ok, it show where Belarus is, so it does it's job. As for the flag, you can see the pattern easily, it's not that difficult to see. I think it's ok.

Your map makes it look like Belarus is the only European country that defied the European unification; and it looks like it is in east Europe. As for the flag, no, is hard to see.



And while we're at it, the mark:

Since when do those rebels in Donetsk have the right to enforce laws? And they even justify themselves to kill people?

Since establishment of the parliament and legislature; the death penalty was made in August. And it's pretty obvious they justify themselves to kill folk - not just since August, since the war in Donbass began.

We should just call it Brześć to avoid confusion ;)

Don't make me call Warsaw Varšava ;)

In most northern European languages Belarus is called something what literary means "White-Russia" for example in Dutch it's called Wit-Rusland

There have actually been appeals from some Belarusians to change the names of Belarus in their tongues, but none have been done since it's quite ridiculous and not significant. In Belarusian, Bela means white as well, but Rus, as some nationalists will tell you, is not Russia.

Your map makes it look like Belarus is the only European country that defied the European unification

How?

and it looks like it is in east Europe.

But Belarus is in east Europe.

As for the flag, no, is hard to see.

Well, you've provided a larger version of the pattern, so I don't need to now.

The existence of Belarus as an independent nation seems an odd fact of history. It had never done so before the collapse of the Soviet Union, and yet it's a relatively stable nation, compared to the other 4 non-independent pre-soviet nations (Tajikstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgistan, and Uzbekistan).

Other than that, Go Belarus!

Uzbekistan hadn't previously been independent, but the Uzbek Horde in the region had been a strong regional power a few hundred years ago, and the peoples of that region had clearly continued living under various rule, but only got their independence back a while later.



Not unlike Ukraine, but Ukraine can only be traced back to the Kievan Rus', up until the Ukrainian citizens lived under many different countries' rule, and were independent for short periods of time before their extended period of independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Edited 10/18/2015 22:58:24

Your map makes it look like Belarus is the only European country that defied the European unification


How?

The only politic borders you can clearly see is Belarus, unless you look closely.

But Belarus is in east Europe.

No, it's in middle Europe - by some estimates, Europe's geographic middle is in Belarus (by most, it is believed to be in Lithuania, near Vilnius).

Well, you've provided a larger version of the pattern, so I don't need to now.

Don't forget to do the same for Turkmenistan.

The existence of Belarus as an independent nation seems an odd fact of history. It had never done so before the collapse of the Soviet Union, and yet it's a relatively stable nation, compared to the other 4 non-independent pre-soviet nations (Tajikstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan).

Well, counting out Kyiv (which was just all the East Slavs, when East Slav was one tongue), Belarus has also had significant independence as Belarusian Folk Republic (1918-1919), which today is the longest running government-in-exile and as the independent Soviet Belarus (1920-1922) (before the SSRU's making). Tajikistan used to be (and still are extremely related to) the Persians, so they had independence, too. I am pretty sure Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan had independent theodes, earlier, as well. And Turkmenistan is very stable, as far as I know.

Not unlike Ukraine, but Ukraine can only be traced back to the Kievan Rus', up until the Ukrainian citizens lived under many different countries' rule, and were independent for short periods of time before their extended period of independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The Ukrainian hetmanates were nominally bit of Polandlithuania; they were independent.

Ox, where did you get that map from?

http://geacron.com/home-fr/?lang=fr

Note that the Cossack Hetmanate was under huge influence of Russia, despite being semi-independent from Poland-Lithuania.

Depends on what times and which ones.

The only politic borders you can clearly see is Belarus, unless you look closely.

So? Go back to the Central African Republic thread: https://www.warlight.net/Forum/113077-country-week-central-african-republic-1?Offset=0 The boarders that aren't the Central African Republic's aren't very clear. The political boarders of countries other than the country of the week aren't reliant to the thread.

No, it's in middle Europe - by some estimates, Europe's geographic middle is in Belarus (by most, it is believed to be in Lithuania, near Vilnius).

And by some estimates, the centre of Europe is in Hungary, it just depends on what boundaries of Europe and method of determining the centre you chose.

Belarus and potatoes. One great bulba love story.

---

Transportation in different countries:

Italy has a ferrari
Britian has a hackney carriage
France has a Peugeot RCZ
America has a Monster truck
Germany has a BMW
Russia has a tank
Japan has a toyota

and for Belarus...a tractor.

Ahhww Belarus why'd you never learn?

So? Go back to the Central African Republic thread: https://www.warlight.net/Forum/113077-country-week-central-african-republic-1?Offset=0 The boarders that aren't the Central African Republic's aren't very clear. The political boarders of countries other than the country of the week aren't reliant to the thread.

It's a problem for Midafrica, as well. You should at least be able to see the borders of the countries it borders - that is reliant to the thread. The names, as well, for those not that map adept.

And by some estimates, the centre of Europe is in Hungary, it just depends on what boundaries of Europe and method of determining the centre you chose.

Yes, but it's most commonly believed to be either in Belarus or Lithuania. Most estimates it put it not far from there. Hungary is an unpopular estimate. Even if it was Hungary, Belarus is not that far east of it anyway.

Ahhww Belarus why'd you never learn?

Fuel efficiency, farming efficiency, biggest tractors in the world, why does noone else ever learn :)?

Belarus is prety far east. If we do it your way then only Russia and maybe Ukraine would be east European countries

Blame Tsardom for conquering such a big part of continent :p

Heh, yes. But anyhow, it's not "my way", I did not make this, but yes, Russia takes up most of the countries that are in East Europe, considering it's 1/3 of Europe total.