you think that if trump is elected president there will be war with mexico? no, they have families over here in California. Hillary is corrupt, trump is his own man. Hillary will be tried with war crimes if she gets president, and try to destroy the constitution as well. just because she has a uterus does not mean she should be elected.

Not a politics guy but that is kind of a weak argument on your part ^

trump is his own man

I say watch dat damn video.


@[AOE] JaiBharat909 @wct

^Not his successor. He has his own HBO show. Jon Stewart's successor is Trevor Noah.

Yea, trevor noah is stewart's successor, even though Oliver and Stewart are really close. I think Oliver is better then Noah. Noah is funny, but the daily show has become somewhat pro-hillary after Stewart left because of political interests, whereas in HBO Oliver is free to do anything he want's pretty much.

Hillary won 85% of the black vote in Southh Carrolina, even though she has cut welfare benefits.... wake up~!

Edited 3/1/2016 04:30:51

^Not his successor. He has his own HBO show. Jon Stewart's successor is Trevor Noah.

Ah. I misunderstood his references to Stewart on the clip. Haven't watched regular TV or cable in quite a while.

I will only vote for Trump if it comes down to him or Hillary. I pray it doesn't come to that though. It frustrates me to no end how both parties are currently pushing their most corrupt candidate to the forefront.

Also, war with Mexico? lolno. Not even Trump is THAT stupid.

Eklipse if it comes down to those two, don't vote if you disagree with both of them. It's throwing away your vote.

http://en.rsf.org/united-states-donald-trump-wants-to-sue-29-02-2016,48877.html

Also, war with Mexico? lolno. Not even Trump is THAT stupid.

It's already happening, to some extent.

watch sargon refute john oliver: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrBPN3Lybeg

X in what way is the USA at war with the USM

Edited 3/1/2016 07:31:16

watch sargon refute john oliver: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrBPN3Lybeg

Not bad the video, I liked it. But I think he misses the point of the Last Week Tonight video. Oliver is just hitting Trump using his own methods, bullying him.

I think it's probably the only way to get him right now. Debate after debate, day after day, he bullies the other candidates, the media, even some people on his own crowds. And that's what those people want. A big strong bully to defend them against the establishment.

They don't care about the truth, they do in fact just want to show a sign to Washington. Well, John is sending one to them, by ridicularising their idol. Seems it's more effective then all the news trashtalking and then pathetic debate couple Rubio/Cruz.

You missed the point of the video. Sargon wasn't saying that being abrasive was ineffective, he was saying that Oliver doesn't understand why people like Trump and that attacking his name will have little effect.

idk, Oliver is pretty smart, and as I said, I think his video will do more damage then rubio, cruz and the mainstream media togheter. This video isn't just about fighting trump supporters, but also about helping to increase the awareness of his show with a polemic and strong video. He's still building his way to become a great comedian. I also doubt his video will increase trump supporters as Sargon suggested.

watch sargon refute john oliver: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrBPN3Lybeg

The verb you're looking for is not 'refute', it is 'disagree with'. Nothing he said refuted anything Oliver said. He just disagrees with Oliver's tactic.

I agree with TeamGuns, Oliver was just out-Trumping Trump. He brought up the name thing because Trump brought up Jon Stewart's name. He's pointing out Trump's cheapness and hypocrisy.

Stewart changed his name because he wanted to appeal to a wider audience, the Dumpf famly changed their name due to prejudice against germans after ww2. Theres no hypocrisy they're 2 entirely different situations. wct you missed the point of sargons' video and he dd refute Oliver. Oliver believes that bashing Trump will work for him because it worked for Trump. Thats an idiotic assumption and he doesn't understand why people support Trump. People don't like Trump because he bashes people. People like Trump because he is a political outsider thats why a lot of republican candidates have been trying to appear as if they're political outsiders as well. That refutes Olivers' point that bashing people will be an effective tactic. Attacking Trump hasn't worked for any of the other candidates and there have been polls that show most people who support Trump support him because hes an outsider.

Eklipse if it comes down to those two, don't vote if you disagree with both of them. It's throwing away your vote.

+1

Eklipse if it comes down to those two, don't vote if you disagree with both of them. It's throwing away your vote.

Throwing away your vote would be not voting. I would much rather have a say in what corrupt idiot I will have as president in the next 4 years than not vote. Seriously, there's no reason to not vote; in fact, the government loves it when people don't vote. If you don't want to cast your vote in for Trump or Hillary, then vote third party.

then pathetic debate couple Rubio/Cruz.

Pathetic? Did you even watch any of the last debate? Trump looked more flustered than he ever had in any of the previous debates. Rubio and Cruz targeting Trump is a good strategy and I think they revealed a weakness.

Trump was all in control when there was a ten candidate free for all and he could just bully Jeb Bush around the entire time. But now that he has just a few strong opponents focusing fire on him he's not quite as sure how to handle it.