Black Lives Matter crowd, Social Justice Warriors, and other Bernie fanboys constantly harrass people at Donald Trump's rallies. Recently, Trump had to cancel a rally because there was a threat of violence in the air.

The progressive media calls these lowlives "protesters". If a Trump supporter defends himself, then the media smears him as violent. If the "protester" happens to be black, then he is also a racist.

If Trump supporters constantly appeared at Bernie rallies, disturbing them and hitting people, would the media call them "protesters"? Of course not, and it hardly comes as a surprise to anyone.

Finally American people appear to be somehow smart.







jk <sarcasm>

Edited 3/12/2016 14:17:51

I saw something that was actually very interesting.

After months of working with a town, a small group of KKK members in a California town got a license to demonstrate.
Soon, a crowd, some BLM members, mostly just civilians began to form, and eventually attacked the Klansmen, one nearly stabbed to death. The towns police had to intervene, and some of the Klansmen were so terrified, they left some of their fellow members behind as they drove away.

Now I don't like the KKK. I think it's completely racist and bigoted. Its an idea that has been shown to be wrong time after time.

What's worse is that the KKK is technically on the law's side, since they had a permit to protest. The HATE GROUP is the innocent party in this case, which means that the people striving for equality have sunk to a lower standard then the racists.

Good job.

Both sides participate in violence against each other, and while the majority of Trumpers are non-violent , so are the protesters who hold signs and disrupt rallies.
To both groups: This is not Weimar Germany, leave the Red-Fascist fighting at the door (and no Freikorps please).

BLM is a racial supremacy movement. They never strove for equality, despite their confusing rhetoric.

It's funny, BLM is so disgusting that even the KKK looks sympathetic by comparison.

They were created in response to police killing blacks on a regular basis. While there are black supremacists and black nationalists in the ranks, the purpose of the organization is not inherently supremacist.

MGSB, that's actually how the KKK started.

The KKK didn't start out (entirely) as a white Supremacy group- it started is a group of people against the Military Rule in the South, where there were cases of soldiers mistreating civilians.

It quickly went bad, though, and got overran by white supremacist- which is exactly whats happening to BLM.

This happened to the Crips too. Originally it was to prevent police brutality, occupying the role the black panthers used to hold. But it slide into the position it's in now , a exclusively criminal organization(that occasionally makes peace with the bloods and goes off to fight ISIS).

To both groups: This is not Weimar Germany, leave the Red-Fascist fighting at the door (and no Freikorps please).

+1.

Puts into perspective on who are the real close-minded bigots. Trying to fuck up a rally is no big deal (happens here all the time, trust me), but violence threats are a whole new level. If your hate for a candidate flows so much you resort to violence, you are effectively commiting a hate crime. But as long as PC is there, if you're either black or gay, you'll have a free get out of jail card. Works best if you have a whole bunch of similar people with you.

I betcha if that same group happened to literally raze a whole city (Fergunson anyone?) people would still defend them and call them protesters. I'll just call them by what they are. If you're wondering, well, here are better names than "protesters" to define BLM.

*Bigots
*Racists
*Vandals
*Nazis
*Ignorant
*Asshats
*Stupider than a typical Colonel trollpost
*Illegal
*Imbeciles
*Murderous
*Psychopaths
*Retards

I'd really love to see the Trumper hillbillies go around with shotguns, threatening a shootout on a Bernie rally. How long would it take for them all to be arrested and called "nazis" again? Hell, they don't even have to threaten, nor hold a shotgun, nor leave their homes, just supporting Trump appearently earns them such title.

Well, maybe this is EXACTLY why America still has (and probably, needs) the KKK. They are basically the same as BLM, except with whites instead of blacks, twice more polite and twice more hated.

The thing I don't like even more is that both are now filled with notorious bigots that despise the other. But BLM is seen as progress, while the KKK is seen as a hateful racist organization.

In my opinion, the only thing worse than mindless hatred is when said hatred is seen as progress and beneficial. That, in my opinion, is one of the most horrid things that can happen.

+1 Zeph

We don't need the KKK. We don't need marauding terrorists hanging blacks and gays. Don't even try saying those arses are justified at this point in time. They murdered, terrorized communities and killed hundreds. We don't need the KKK.

+1 MGSB.

+.5 Zeph.

They were created in response to police killing blacks on a regular basis. While there are black supremacists and black nationalists in the ranks, the purpose of the organization is not inherently supremacist.

I won't deny that there might be some systemic racism against blacks still, but I highly doubt the police systematically targets blacks. Cities with black mayors and black police officers target black people just as much as cities with white mayors and white cops.

The single biggest predictor of delinquency is single motherhood, which is extremely prevalent among black Americans. And it's laws passed by Democrats (war against poverty) that highly incentivizes black mothers to kick their partners out and get government handouts. This is probably the reason why blacks are so overrepresented in crime statistics.

Regarding BLM: there may be some individuals with noble goals among them, but the leadership of the movement is full of fraudsters. The progressive media does its best to emphasize the craziest ideas among the movement, weeding out the moderate voices. BLM is already beyond recovery.

Cities with black mayors and black police officers target black people just as much as cities with white mayors and white cops.

^This. Democratic controlled cities (cough*Chicago*cough) have serious problems with police violence against Blacks.

Trying to fuck up a rally is no big deal (happens here all the time, trust me), but violence threats are a whole new level.

Some big escaped Mexican Mafiozo put a 100 million $ bounty on Trump.

The country has a problem with systematic violence against Americans. I see whites , Hispanics , Asians and Natives being attacked by police alongside blacks. And it's not just a outright violence against citizens problem, the government wants to spy on every single person in the US. The FBI wants teachers and students to report suspicious high schoolers. Obama wants access to the phones of millions of people across the country.

The only way to stop systematic oppression against African-Americans is to stop systematic oppression against Americans.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/03/12/attempted_attack_on_donald_trump_was_worse_than_it_looked.html

Well, I guess that if you spread hate, it's normal to attract hate against you...

Racist and islamophic attacks have also increased in the US in the past year, and it's very much related to trump's speeches... You can't defend trump like he's an angel and say that people anger at him are the devil.