He's more likely to send out a search mission to find Bin Laden, then discover him where Obama says he dumped him, and bring him back to DC and rape him on live television (Fox, of course).
If you want to compare the two major party candidates, yeah Trump could be called less interventionist but that's not saying much when the other candidate is Clinton.
The best candidate (either Johnson or Petersen) are actually non-interventionist though.
Economics: Trump is usually lauded as good economically, but can we actually look at his policies?
• Minimum Wage: He is for raising the wage to 15 dollars an hour, making it extremely unprofitable and harder for companies to start in America and this would ironically cause more outsourcing.
• Regulations: Alright he's in favor of getting rid of regulations. That's it. I actually like this, anyone who likes him for this is liking him for a good reason.
• Taxes: Lowering them is good, but he doesn't want to lower them enough. This might sound like nitpicking, but that's because it is.
• Drugs: He's not for full legalization and deregulation, so bad on him. This is part economic and part criminal so I will focus on the economics. Think of the jobs that could be greated across our unused farmland from marijuana, poppy, etc cultivation.
I can't really think of much else for economics right now, but if I do I will post.
