Trump's the best candidate because he will slash political correctness, curb illegal immigration, and waterboard radical Islamic terrorists. But if you don't think these are important issues, then at least keep in mind that while Trump is a question mark who could be good or bad, we already know that Hillary will be bad.

If you think he will do all of those things, you don't know very much about the role of the President of the United States.

Hint: they are not a dictator who gets to make whatever changes they want. If other people want to be politically correct, they will be. He cannot force them to say brash, inflammatory, racist, retarded things like he does. If congress and/or the military do not agree with him about waterboarding, we will not waterboard suspected or accused terrorists. If the states and congress and a lot of other people don't agree with his immigration ideas then the changes he wants will not take place. He does not have sole authority to build his wall, for instance.

Even if Congress manages to block some of his reforms, he's still a step in the right direction. And if someone tries to block everything he's doing, he knows how to bully them into obedience.

Have you not been paying attention the last 8 years? Congress tells Obama to fuck himself if he asks for more toilet paper. Congress can certainly block everything he wants to do. But you are correct that if you want racism and vulgar speech and torture, he is a step in the right direction.

Trump has little chance in getting much of his crap through. He'd only realistically do this all if he expanded the power of the executive branch by a lot. That's not too unrealistic though.

Also Knyte is a much better Clinton supporter than WB.

Edited 6/13/2016 09:31:35

Have you not been paying attention the last 8 years? Congress tells Obama to fuck himself if he asks for more toilet paper. Congress can certainly block everything he wants to do.

You are absolutely right that Obama is a weak president. Nobody likes him, nobody respects him. And that's why we need someone like Trump. He can get things done, unlike that token vagina on the other side.

But you are correct that if you want racism and vulgar speech and torture, he is a step in the right direction.

Well your skill at Warlight is shitty, but not quite as bad as your understanding of politics. Just because someone is not politically correct and the media doesn't like them doesn't mean that they are a racist.

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-great-spirits-have-always-encountered-violent-opposition-from-mediocre-minds-the-mediocre-mind-is-albert-einstein-226507.jpg

*watches thread from #HillaryForPrison2016 train*

The only train worth being on pertaining to being critical of Clinton is the train that involves her being treated like one of the people that were bombed and/or attacked by Foriegn policy she supported. If you're not on that train, you're attacking her for the wrong reasons.

Edited 6/13/2016 11:23:33

#HillaryForTargetPracticeTrain?

Hint: they are not a dictator who gets to make whatever changes they want.

Executive Orders. That nifty abuse that Obama has gotten away with pretty cleanly, something Democrats haven't really complained about, but are horrified of the idea of Trump using. All the increased Presidential power that Obama accumulated will potentially be passed down to Trump, just think about that.

You are absolutely right that Obama is a weak president.

Straw man. That is not what I said. I said congress is blocking everything he wants to do. As they could do to Trump.

And that's why we need someone like Trump. He can get things done

Maybe if he were a dictator he could get things done. Being President and working with congress does not take bluster and trolling people in the media. His own party fucking hates him, most of them say they wont endorse him or even vote for him! Why do you suddenly think they are going to want to work with him on his ideas, most of which they don't agree with?

Just because someone is not politically correct and the media doesn't like them doesn't mean that they are a racist.

You're right. But trump happens to be vulgar and racist and wants torture. All independent of each other.

Well your skill at Warlight is shitty

I see, you are just a troll. Sorry I wasted my time.

Edited 6/13/2016 12:23:24

#HillaryForTargetPracticeTrain?

Ever seen the video of Gadaffi being killed? Oh that would be so damn ironic.

I've never really bought into the idea of the whole email thing or her killing people; It's plain and simple, I just disagree with her policies. And I feel that most people who disagree with a candidate do actually disagree with their policies, but for some reason want to mask this what amounts to a flame war. That being said, Here are some of her policies I disagree with:

1. Is in favor of charging rich people more in taxes than they already pay (currently the top 5% of americans pay 60% of all income taxes).

2. Is in favor of more Gun control with the justificatiion that 33,000 people are killed per year by guns (If you'd like I can rant all day about this, but yeah..)

3. Abortion; She insists on referring to it as "A womans right to choose", which besides being much longer and a pain in the butt to say is also much less descriptive than "Abortion". She is also against ending government involvement in abortion.

4. Is against ending government involvement in marriage.

5. Is anti free-trade and for price floors, I mean what else do you want me to say, her economic policy is a total failure.

Maybe if he were a dictator he could get things done. Being President and working with congress does not take bluster and trolling people in the media. His own party fucking hates him, most of them say they wont endorse him or even vote for him! Why do you suddenly think they are going to want to work with him on his ideas, most of which they don't agree with?

They don't hate him, they just say so publicly because they must keep up appearances. They also say they hate Democrats but then they go to lunch together. Save Lightweight Lindsey and poor Jeb whose brother was a disaster as president, they all seem to be able to work with Trump.

You're right. But trump happens to be vulgar and racist and wants torture. All independent of each other.

ISIS is an organization more brutal than maybe any other in history. Even the Taliban don't approve of their methods. Why should we treat ISIS fighers with kid gloves if they proudly torture innocents and upload it on YouTube? No, let's do what Sweden does and give returning ISIS fighers war veterans' benefits!

I see, you are just a troll. Sorry I wasted my time.

So sorry I spilled the beans. You worked so hard to make everyone believe you are the best player on Warlight.

You can say I'm not the best player, to say I'm shitty is just trolling. I'm 18th on the ladder, win 82% 1v1. That is objectively, by any possible measure, somebody who is not 'shitty at warlight'. You have very few stats on this account but I presume I'm much better than you.

Is in favor of more Gun control

There is no reasonable argument for not being in favor of more gun control, unless you're some stupid old hick who doesn't want to give up his guns. Unfortunately there are a lot of those in this country and they vote. As they slowly die off, we'll have more and more restrictions until one day the only people who can have guns are cops. As it should be.

Edited 6/13/2016 15:15:06

Until a cop has his gun stolen, or someone uses a bomb, or someone makes a gun, or someone smuggles a gun. And then suddenly, if there are no cops around, shit hits the fan real fast.

#ClintonCab *

And yeah, she'll be a decent president. Idk if she'll be better or worse than Obama, only her 8 years will tell.

There is no reasonable argument for not being in favor of more gun control

Yes there is. The reason is that if you want to overthrow your government, it's a lot easier to do if you have guns than if you're put at an automatic disadvantage since only the people you're trying to overthrow have guns.

unless you're some stupid old hick who doesn't want to give up his guns.

The states with the highest levels of gun ownership are in the west, not the appalachians. Such as:

Wyoming - 59.7%
Alaska - 57.8%
Montana - 57.7%
South Dakota - 56.6%
Idaho - 55.3%

Until a cop has his gun stolen, or someone uses a bomb, or someone makes a gun, or someone smuggles a gun. And then suddenly, if there are no cops around, shit hits the fan real fast.

Shit hits the fan real fast constantly now. It's not about eliminating that completely, which is not possible. It's about reducing it by a lot. If gun related deaths can be reduced by 90%, 80%, even 20%, that's a great thing. That's a lot of lives saved. And what are we giving up? Just those old hicks being happy with their guns that they never use anywhere other than the gun range and hunting