You literally want to subjugate every Muslim country, rob millions of their weaponry, and stop folk from reproducing naturally. You're an authoritarian Chatul.

Your ideology is awful. Ideological consistency is better.

No, not robbing. Just removing. It's fine if they want to be compensated for such removal and we should buy these weapons at fair market price.

No, not removing, these are possessions and people own them. If you take them without consent, that is robbing. And if they refuse what will you do? Kill or harm them.

You said that I want to subjugate every Muslim country. The reality is that as long as they exist they keep subjugating their women, children and unbelievers. So this "subjugation" is in fact liberation of individuals from authoritarianism.

The reality is that these countries would be run by foreign governments and ruled by foreign armies, with no regard for the well being of the folk in those countries. You are about as liberating as the Nazis in Russia.

Well I don't see any inconsistency

You are enforcing martial law on folk in an attempt to free them from oppression. Martial law is oppression. You are trying to free oppressed folk with oppression.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/80/Islam_attitudes.png/600px-Islam_attitudes.png

You haven't even explained how this would actually work. While countries like Banglesdesh would be easy to invade, you will run quickly into the problem of certain countries being extremely militant in general. Pakistan and Turkey are ones for example. Both have large militaries, both have been involved in conflicts, and Pakistan is nuclear armed. Both are large in regards to population, have some good defensive terrain and have allies who wouldn't take lightly to your crusade. In regards to Africa, there are numerous states with small to mid sized militaries that could conscript and defend some key points, like the region of Africa where only the coast is really usable in regards to military advancing, and the Suez Canal, which could be closed off. The Sahara would provide a good defensive barrier.

Edited 8/21/2016 21:19:18

Can we talk about the article?

Pakistan needs to have all its nukes suddenly snatched by peacekeepers before the disarmament campaign officially begins.

Which is improbable, and will be a catalyst for Iran and other Muslim countries to speed up production of nuclear weapons.

If the nukes can be removed we can begin our campaign (no, not a Crusade, many participants are Hindu or secular).

Your crusade will be likely volunteer at the first phase, and guess who's most likely to join, Christians like Paugers and GeneralPE, radicals.

A UN Standby Force has to exist to ensure that the global campaign against militant religious groups is successful everywhere including in Africa.

Your UNSF will be in combat with mostly conventional militaries as the conventional hostile militaries are huge and in good positions. Any forces that could participate in small scale campaigns would be at other fronts.

If the AU can not deal with Islamists in Sudan or Chad for example we need to airlift the UNSF in to disband them.

The conventional militaries of dozens of countries will be able to participate against the UNSF.

Extremism will finally alienate all non-extremists since extremists can be at war with everyone else.

You're bringing war to the entire Islamic world; there will be no extremism, as everyone will universally support war against the non-Muslims. You have entered a war you cannot possibly hope to win against a group of folk galvanized in their cause to stop you.

Note; it is likely that this will be the bloodiest war in human history.

So when I prove that your genocidal crusade on Islam is not viable or moral you revert to talking points?

Most extremists, like folk in Saudi Arabia or folk like Squiggles have not attacked or prepared for war with non-Muslim countries.

Actually, Chatul, you're an authoritarian that wants to force people to believe in democracy and secularism.

- I agree with Squiggles here. Weird huh.

I also agree with MGSB here. You can't stop them from believing an idea by force like '' YIU DON LIKE SEKULARIZM11??!! I KILL YU N UR CHILDREN IN BATTLE'' You're just an extremist in denial.

I don't belive in Democracy - Squiggles

Then leave Netherlands for Saudi Arabia, i am sure they will treat you better.


There are extremists like Squiggles even in the one of the most progressive countries.

I ain't givin' my gun. What you gonna do now, big boy?


Taking children to brainwash them into your ideology? Sounds like some oppressive countries i know.

Edited 8/21/2016 22:32:15

^^^ There is no plan for a genocide. Just disarmament. It is not restricted to Islamism either. Any other militant religious sect needs to be disarmed as well. However usually the police can disarm militant religious sect members except for Islamists, LRA in Uganda, etc.

You cannot disarm a entire military without starting a war with said military. This war will make citizens join the military and when you go to murder them, you'll end up killing millions of folk for their, guess what, religion.

^^ Nope people who love liberty does not need to kill authoritarians. Just disenfranchise them and take their kids away. One is entitled to believe whatever he/she wants, however dangerous ideas need to be contained.

You don't love liberty you dolt, you're proposing a world war, which is the absolute worst environment for liberty.

I ain't givin' my gun. What you gonna do now, big boy?

^

What next, you gonna move into Texas and try to take our guns too because a lot of us are conservative?

^^There are no militant religious sects in Texas that warrant the military to tackle.

If there were, would you justify invading Texas, killing anyone who resists and oppressing the folk like you do here?

It's fine if you are conservative or liberal as long as you are not an authoritarian that is a danger to human democracy

Conservatives and liberals are defintely authoritarians.

You are certainly a friend of liberty as opposed to its enemy.

You are no friend of liberty, you want to murder millions and subjugate over a billion folk.

Don't parent him/her and let her/him make his/her choices. We'll just take her/him and fill his/her mind with whatever we want. Oh also we're taking your guns and your right to protect your country, don't rebel okay?

Edited 8/22/2016 00:08:26

Meanings of Secularism and other stuff can be defined different by each person, liberalism can mean left ideology but to others it can mean the principals of ''classic liberalism''. How long would it take for people who are powerful to change your already horrible policies to worse than North Korea's

People have different ideas and ideologies than mine?! Let's take their children and brainwash them =/= Secularism and Liberalim.

They still didn't answer MGSB's question. What if we refuse to give OUR KIDS and OUR GUNS?! Will you enter our home guns blazing? That is worse than ISIS

Edited 8/22/2016 00:17:13

First, you absolutely have no right to talk about Atatürk you extreme liberal. Second, the moment you say that in Turkey people would do one of these things
1. Laugh and mock you for thinking you are even close to him
2. Will kick you out from their shop/street for insulting Atatürk
3. Beat you to a pulp.

Edited 8/22/2016 00:21:00