Okay, thats it. It's not a matter of a SJWs calling out you for racism. You ARE racist. You litterally say every black child has less chances to succedd than an East Asian.

Give blacks proper education and they can achieve all that too.

You are litterally comparing 2 different worlds.

Another fun fact: Prehistoric Europeans were already pretty advanced.

As someone here a time ago (maybe it was you) pointed out: Sub Saharian cultures are probably less advanced because they were never required to store their food. Storing food leads to storing other things and eventually creates a higher culture.
This has nothing to do with gentics, but with culture and education. If everyone was educated in a European way, we would all think European.

Edited 7/15/2017 01:16:49

you're basing your arguments on small scattered anecdotal evidence like BUILDINGS!

You've said stuff before like "I have an Ukrainian friend. On this basis I declare all Ukrainians good people!" and now you're taking it to the next step where you see a picture of a pretty building and think "Wow, whatever ethnic group this builder was a member of must be a good one!". Why not "whatever sex" and "right-handed/left-handed" grouping then?

Semice is the only Chinese guy I know and he acts like a drugged up hobo all the time and makes shitty NGL streams that he spams invites to me all the time. On this basis I declare China as shit!

I also know that in China, murder rates against doctors are disproportionately high contrasted to other cultures. Wow!!! Chinese hate doctors!!!

Even later, I found out that China was run by one of the most brutal dictators in the last 100 years. Woah! Chinese folk suck!!

^
How do you know? You cant trust Chinese statistics. They are lieing left and right.

They are even lieing on the climate. Litterally every statistic from China is rigged to make them look better. I am not using anything to support my claim, because their is no data to verify it.

My mum was in both for decades and survived without problems.
Where do you get your assumption from that you are not safe in Sub-Saharian countries?

Edited 7/15/2017 01:33:00

^
And who does those crimes? Let me guess, the poor?

Rich country =/= Rich people

now you're just taking 2 totally different jurisdictions.

If you ever backed up any of your claims with hard-to-argue-against data like you claim there are, then there wouldn't be a problem, but instead you compare things with a lot of confounding variables. Ooh why do Chechens not have as many Nobel prizes as Israelites? must be that the Chechen genes are bad, not that they lived through a war, they live in a shitty government that taboos a lot anti-Islamic teachings, and international cooperation, their schools suck bad, and were already poor as shit but now are poor as hell after the war destroyed the bank, and that the Nobel Prize is biased and is questionable to begin with, and that only extreme outliers of humans get the Nobel Prize, meaning that even if a lot of Israelites got a Nobel Prize, does not mean the median Israelite is more likely to get the Nobel Prize.

Edited 7/15/2017 04:54:46

Tabby, you can't let personal beliefs or feelings towards a certain race get in the way of debating about them. Like the Russian guy said it's because of the factors that these African nations aren't like Japan or Europe. You tried to compare Japan to these African nations which is really unfair, wanna know why? Because Japan wasn't colonized to a point to that MILLIONS of your people die, your society collapses and your nations pride is non-existent. You know Japanese people had the perfect environment to grow, they were a united nation and no one attacked their main land killing their men, raping their women and killing their children. I also hope you know when the European Imperialists came and DESTROYED Africa they didn't kill the weak they killed the STRONG!. I understand what you're saying Africans really really really need to improve in alot of aspects to fit in this modern world which they ARE doing, I agree with that but you claim that they are a sub-species and all this BS which is not true. I mean look at my country the my people of the Darfur and South really fucked up my great country, I mean look at us during the 60's 70's we really were a great nation but that is no excuse to call them sub-species, hate on them, and send them off to Sub-Saharan Africa. What we should do is start programs to educate them and help them fit into this modern world this is what we should do as humans! This is the answer Tabby, after all they are just people who have no clue what they're doing their ancestors raped, enslaved and killed.. It's just that they don't know any better so what should we do? Educate them and help them grow..

Poland wasn't colonized for decades and generations it was merely a devastating war. However, if Poland was colonized for decades and its people had their confidence in the country and themselves shattered and not knowing their self-worth. Don't try to compare Poland in WW2 with an imperialistic country colonizing a country. What I'm trying to say colonization RUINS a country. It destroys everything. Also, don't try to show me examples of countries that benefited off of colonialism because I am specifically talking about the African nations that were destroyed by this. Look at Nigeria it's not doing bad. Same thing with Ethiopa and South Africa. You can't just bring countries that are JUST starting to get modernized after being colonized not too long ago and compare them with European nations that were independent for a very very long time and had an era of peace and prosperity. Have some empathy anyways it's as if the things you say is coming from a robot , seriously be human.

Difference is that Poland got helped afterwards, while African countries in the 60s and 70s were mostly left alone.

due to basically European Countries basically destroying their countries with colonialism. ( please don't argue with that )


- LOL, before Europeans came there was not even ONE stable african state, and i just love the ''please don't argue with that'' nice logic.

"though it usually also have unexpected and unintended benefits on conquered peoples."

not always

in fact not "usually" either, the ratio is 50% at maximum and even that's a stretch

sure in some areas(mainly in Africa) imperialism brought relative prosperity as the European colonisers built infastructure and agriculture...yes those countries are unstable but when were they even stable anyway?

but in some other areas(especially on Middle East) we can clearly see imperialism completely destroyed and destabilized the region.

Edited 7/15/2017 15:32:40

LOL, before Europeans came there was not even ONE stable african state, and i just love the ''please don't argue with that'' nice logic.

Ethiopia, Egypt, Tunis, Kilwa, Ajuuran, hmm all old countries that fell to European interventions. Furthermore he wasn't even talking about states.

Edited 7/15/2017 15:44:13

and it wasn't "dark age" when it was under the hands of the Ottomans? Mamelukes? Seljuqs? Old Caliphates? Byzantines?

it's an obvious fact that Middle East used to be one of the most peaceful regions before the 20th century, with ancient prosperous cities and on par with technology if not ahead of it from time to time

every single conflict happening in the Middle East today can be directly tied to the imperialist elements caused after the breakup of Ottoman Empire

>Every single conflict can be attributed to one causal event

people actually think this

^^This logic ignores the fact that imperialism has never destroyed Poland and Northeast Asian countries. It has not destroyed India either. It did not destroy Malaysia. It did not destroy Egypt.

Tabby I am talking about colonialism TO Central African countries, not to other countries. Egypt and Malaysia were colonized but they weren't treated like the Central African countries. No, I am not saying the countries you mentioned were treated equally I am saying that Central Africans were treated horribly... on a different level! To such an extent that it destroyed their societies and set them back so they could not advance with the rest of the world unlike Malaysia, Egypt and etc these countries were damaged not gonna lie, BUT they weren't destroyed like the Central African countries so they just had a bit of rebuilding and they were back on their feet and advancing like the rest of the world. Think about it this way, Colonialism is a giant axe. It hits Egypt, Malaysia, and India at their palm and cuts 2 fingers off. The next person that got colonized was Central Africa. Colonialism hits Central Africa right at its knee injuring it so it couldn't walk while Egypt healed and is back in the race of advancing with the rest of humanity.


due to basically European Countries basically destroying their countries with colonialism. ( please don't argue with that )


- LOL, before Europeans came there was not even ONE stable African state, and I just love the ''please don't argue with that'' nice logic.

So you're telling me the African people are better off with colonialism? Listen, I'm not here to debate with idiots like you that insult me and reply back with one-liners. Seriously, speak with confidence and evidence, not one sentence that's a half-assed insult and an opinion.